- Obama to Central American leaders: I need help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
MOVIE REVIEW: ‘Her’
Question of the Day
How often do you check your mobile phone each day? For many Americans, the act is now an instinct as much conscious decision. Typical smartphone users look at their devices upwards of 100 times daily, and the vast majority of adults under the age of 45 rarely leave their phone unattended for more than a few hours, according to a Facebook-sponsored online report. When the phone isn’t at hand, the computer or the laptop frequently is.
This uninterrupted proximity, and the steady engagement that follows, means it’s only a mild exaggeration to suggest that some of our closest relationships are with technology — the screens and systems that manage our communications, information, and by extension, our lives.
That notion is central to the high-concept premise of “Her,” which cleverly posits a near future in which basically normal people have meaningful relationships with self-aware operating systems.
Basically normal may be a bit of an exaggeration: Theodore (Joaquin Phoenix), the movie’s loveable and lovelorn protagonist, is an awkward nerd, with a fussy mustache and a penchant for high water pants that bag and balloon around his waist (his britches are too big for him). He’s recently divorced, and struggling to date, when he installs a new OS, Samantha (voiced with marvelous delicacy by Scarlett Johansson), an intelligent and sensitive presence who lives in his computer and phone, speaking privately to him through a tiny earpiece. They enjoy each other’s company, and quickly become something more than friends.
Part of the gag is how blithely people seem to take this strange behavior, which seems bizarre to us, but in the movie’s world is as common as Internet dating is today. In a way, Theodore is just dating his secretary. But the movie also slyly hints at how close we already are to its imagined reality: Operating systems are designed to understand their users and customize themselves accordingly; our computers already watch, listen and sort intimate communications; our phones can listen to us, and to talk back.
In the hands of a typical filmmaker, this could easily turn into a one-note gimmick. But writer-director Spike Jonze gifts this digital romance with a remarkable tenderness. Mr. Jonze, the director of “Adaptation” and “Being John Malkovich,” has already proven adept at crafting quirky high-concept features, but those films, both scripted by Charlie Kaufman, came from the head. Despite its heady premise, Mr. Jonze’s script and direction come from the heart. “Her” is a movie about modern love, not about the science and technology of artificial intelligence.
If anything, it occasionally verges on too simplistically heartfelt. I wish Mr. Jonze had spent just a bit more time exploring the implications of romantic entanglements with intelligent technology.
Instead, Mr. Jones keeps the focus on the film’s core emotional insight: that the capacity to change, learn and adapt to other people is what allows for moments of great romantic connection, and also what makes sustaining those connections so hard. It’s a smart, charming movie about technology, intimacy and connection, about falling out of love and into it. I fell in love with it along the way.
★★★★ (out of four stars)
CREDITS: Written, directed by Spike Jonze
RATING: R for language, raunchy talk, sexual suggestiveness
RUNNING TIME: 126 minutes
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq