- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Constitution far from ‘flawed’
Question of the Day
At President Obama’s swearing-in ceremony, he pledged under oath, “I will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Mr. Obama as been quoted calling the Constitution an outdated, flawed document and saying it reflects a blind spot where race is concerned.
Mr. Obama is supposedly a constitutional lawyer, but I feel the need to remind the president of a couple of important facts regarding the Constitution. The Founding Fathers knew the Constitution was not perfect and that circumstances would obviously change over time. They brilliantly penned an amendment process, which can be found in Article V.
The signing of the Constitution took place on Sept. 17, 1787. At that time in our history, black Americans had very few rights; many were slaves, which was a horrid, shameful situation. In January 1865, the 13th Amendment was put into effect, finally prohibiting slavery. On Feb. 3, 1870, the 15th Amendment guaranteed black Americans the right to vote. On Aug. 18, 1920, via the 19th Amendment, women finally won the right to vote.
The amendment process requires a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This co-called “flawed” document is anything but.
Mr. Obama defies the Constitution and constantly breaks his oath to uphold and protect it. It looks to me like the amendment process was designed to correct some problems and provide flexibility in changing times.
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title