- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Fossil-fuel divestment a moral issue
In her op-ed “A feel-good folly” (Dec. 23), which criticizes the D.C. Council’s proposal to take the District’s investments out of fossil-fuel companies, Paula R. Jackson misses the point of divestment. The leverage this movement aims to bring is not simply economic. It’s moral.
Ms. Jackson writes as if fossil-fuel companies — who financially support her organization, the American Association of Blacks in Energy — are somehow blameless despite everything we know about their contribution to climate pollution. She writes as though the working, poor and struggling families of the District and every state are somehow responsible for solving the climate crisis by themselves.
This is a basic issue of justice. The wealthiest corporations on Earth have the power to help solve the problems they have done so much to create. But recent research uncovered that these same companies spend nearly $1 billion a year to fight progress on climate change.
Ms. Jackson is mistaken on the status of divestment efforts in San Francisco. The San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System actually took a step toward selling off its fossil-fuel stocks, with a unanimous decision to advocate for the industry to change its practices and to further study divestment of its $16 billion fund from fossil fuels.
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- EDITORIAL: Connecticut revolts against gun controls that could criminalize 300,000
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Two liberals say Sarah Palin is right: Obama lacks substance
- Malaysia Airlines says plane on route to Beijing missing
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- Soldier who hid to avoid saluting the flag to be punished in secret; Army won't release details
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults