- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- ISTOOK: IRS “wants to throw us in jail,” says tea party leader
- Easter woes: Chocolate costs soar, becoming ‘unaffordable’ luxury
- Michaels craft chain confirms hackers hit 3M customers
- Special Forces’ suicide rates hit record levels — casualties of ‘hard combat’
- Many Americans would quickly face financial hardship after losing job, poll shows
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Feds’ ‘knockout’ case unjustified
A recent article in The Washington Times noted that the Obama administration is federally prosecuting a white man in Texas for knocking out a black victim, "even though most other cases" have "involved black assailants," none of whom has been federally prosecuted ("Feds charge white man with hate crime in first 'knockout' prosecution," Web, Dec. 26). The Obama Justice Department launched the federal prosecution even though local police were already investigating the perpetrator.
This unnecessary federal hate-crimes prosecution reveals the falsity of claims made by supporters of the federal hate-crimes law to get it enacted in 2009. They claimed federal prosecutions would only occur in the rare circumstance when a state ignored or trivialized a hate crime, or denied the victim justice, citing the law's requirement that the attorney general certify the circumstances justifying federal intervention.
No such circumstances justify this federal prosecution. Far from ignoring hate crimes, local police initiated the investigation that led to this arrest. Earlier, Texas executed a white supremacist who killed a black man.
The only reason given for the federal prosecution is that "Justice Department officials said" it would "make a point about hate crimes." But making a public relations point is not sufficient reason for federalizing quintessentially local crimes. As the Supreme Court emphasized in United States v. Morrison in 2000, states — not the federal government — are responsible for prosecuting such crimes.
Competitive Enterprise Institute
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- Immigration still on hold: Boehner's office
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- PRUDEN: When a bored president just 'mails it in'
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- BRUCE: Obama deliberately emboldening America's enemies
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Probe Boston teen's medical, custody case
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support a modern-day Tiananmen protest
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: An honorable president would resign
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable