- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Support for stricter gun laws drops: poll
Support for stricter gun laws appears to be fading as the first anniversary of the Connecticut school shootings in Newtown approaches, according to a new poll unveiled on the same day some of the 911 tapes from the Sandy Hook shootings were released.
Forty-nine percent of Americans say they support stricter gun laws and 50 percent oppose them, according to the CNN/ORC International survey. That's down from 55 percent who supported stricter laws in a January CNN poll, weeks after gunman Adam Lanza killed 20 children and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. Then, 44 percent opposed stricter laws.In a CNN poll from April, 53 percent supported stricter laws, and 45 percent opposed them. That survey was conducted just before a bill to expand gun-purchase background checks failed in the U.S. Senate.
Since January, the percentage of those who say they "strongly favor" stricter gun laws has declined from 37 percent to 31 percent, and the percentage who strongly oppose them has risen from 27 percent to 32 percent.
The poll of 843 adults by ORC International was conducted from Nov. 18 to 20 and has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.
It was released as some of the 911 calls from the Dec. 14, 2012 incident were made public Wednesday.
"It sounds like there are gunshots in the hallway — I'm a teacher in the school," a woman can be heard saying in one of the calls.
"Keep everybody calm, keep everybody down, get everybody away from the windows, OK?" the dispatcher says.
"There's still shooting going on — please," a man says in another recording, followed by repeated banging noises. "Still — still going on."
Since the failed vote on background checks in April, Congress has shown little appetite for revisiting legislation specifically dealing with guns, aside from the House this week renewing a law banning undetectable plastic firearms. Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, has vowed to push a broader bill ahead of a Monday deadline to renew the ban, first passed in 1988.
Mr. Schumer and his allies say the law needs to expand and require that metal parts in plastic-and-metal guns be nonremovable so as to make all guns detectable by airport or other building security checks. But it's unclear to what extent his fellow Senate Democrats want another fight over firearms ahead of midterm elections next year.
He said Tuesday that if the push for the broader bill fails, he'll seek to simply pass the House bill and continue to work on it once the ban is renewed.
Still, the recent suicide of a Virginia state senator's son has brought the issue of mental health back to the forefront in the debate.
Rep. Tim Murphy, Pennsylvania Republican, said recently he intends to propose legislation dealing with mental health. He cited the case of Austin "Gus" Deeds, the son of Virginia state Sen. R. Creigh Deeds, Bath Democrat, who underwent a psychiatric evaluation last month but was released after officials couldn't find him a bed in a treatment facility. The next day, Gus Deeds stabbed his father, who was the Democratic nominee for Virginia governor in 2009, before taking his own life with a rifle.
Since then, Mr. Deeds told The Recorder newspaper in Monterey, Va., he's going to devote himself to the issue so that "other families don't have to go through what we are living."
In Connecticut, a report by State's Attorney Stephen J. Sedensky III in Danbury, Conn., said Lanza had mental health problems but, nearly a year after the December shooting, it is impossible to discern a specific motive for the attack.
"It is important to note that it is unknown, what contribution, if any, the shooter's mental health issues made to his attack on [Sandy Hook]," the report said. "Those mental health professionals who saw him did not see anything that would have predicted his future behavior."
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Michael Bloomberg charts $50M challenge to NRA: 'Got to make them afraid'
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
- Obama urged to enforce ban on importing military-style firearms
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.