- Deadly N.Y. train derailment leads to Senate call for cameras at tracks
- WWII vet, 90, en route to Pearl Harbor event booted from flight
- SWAT team at Phoenix hospital as armed man clears emergency room
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle dragged from political meeting, booted from party
- Big storm dumps snow on East Coast, travel dicey
- Thai prime minister dissolves Parliament, calls elections
- Hagel to meet with Pakistan’s prime minister
- Kiev: Riot police deployed near protest sites
- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
- U.N.: Afghanistan slow to enforce law protecting women
SIMMONS: D.C. hospital contract overdue for oversight
It has been nearly a year since Marion Barry and fellow D.C. Council member David A. Catania got into a profanity-laced sparring match over the fiscal health of United Medical Center, and here we are, approaching another Valentine's Day and troubles have escalated.
The council is scheduled to hold a hearing Wednesday afternoon on Contract No. DCHT-2012-C-0014 Approval Resolution of 2013, the technical name for Mayor Vincent C. Gray’s proposal to spend $12,759,970 to “turnaround” the city’s struggling publicly owned hospital.
The amount of money for the contract is in dispute, since it exceeded the original budget by $2.7 million, and the awarding of the contract is contentious, as some lawmakers question how Huron Consulting Services LLC of Chicago won the contract.
What is indisputable is the city’s chief financial officer advised against purchasing the formerly privately owned hospital in 2010, which has had questionable mismanagement and expenditures, including federal dollars.
Moreover, council oversight has itself been negligible — and that’s a modest characterization.
Indeed, the Barry-Catania Valentine's Day blow-up in 2012 stemmed from Mr. Catania’s taking offense at questions from Mr. Barry, Ward 8 Democrat, regarding the future of the hospital, which, as the Washington Business Journal reported in July 2011, was already on life-support, since “the government has reworked Medicaid formulas to spur revenue and dedicated staff nearly full time to aiding the hospital’s on-site managers and governing board.”
At the time, Mr. Catania, at-large independent, was chairman of the council’s Committee on Health, so it is somewhat understandable why his reaction to Mr. Barry’s search for the facts drew such an emotionally obscene response.
Yet facts are precisely what the council should be in search of Wednesday, when it conducts a public hearing on Mr. Gray’s proposal to spend millions on a process that provides absolutely no direct health care benefits to the District’s indigent residents.
The hearing is being held, in part, because of dogged reporting by one of my colleagues, Jeffrey Anderson, whose recent news stories have provided details of irregularities and government officials’ responses regarding the $12.7 million contract:
City officials skirted D.C. law by awarding the contract to Huron, whose initial bid failed to include a D.C. certified minority contractor.
To cover their tracks, city officials indulged in a do-over, and Huron won again, leading critics on the losing side to raise the irregularity specter.
The hospital lost $13 million in fiscal 2012 under Mr. Catania’s watchdoglike eyes.
While Mr. Catania no longer has oversight as chairman, he remains a committee member. His actions at the hearing should speak volumes.
Mr. Anderson quoted the Health Committee’s new chairwoman, Yvette M. Alexander, Ward 7 Democrat, as describing the contract as “quite pricey for what they are tasked to do.” Here again, the original cost was an estimated $10 million.
At-large Democrat Vincent B. Orange was the first to call for an investigation, pointing out that D.C. law called for the bid by Huron to be “disqualified” because it originally did not include a certified minority subcontractor.
Now, whether you support mandating minority firms for government contracts or not, the law is the law — unless and until the city changes it.
Some council members, including Mr. Barry, view the firms on the losing end of the United Medical Center “turnaround” contract as chickens chattering in the churchyard.
But the hearing scheduled for 3 p.m. Wednesday will give the council — and ultimately, the public — an opportunity to prove the Gray administration is not above the law and will be held accountable.
After all, it was the council that endorsed the plan to buy the hospital in the first place.
Shut it down: It’s interesting the Gray administration said it cannot afford to keep the doors open to more than a dozen schoolhouses, but can afford to keep digging into coffers for a public hospital that the overwhelming majority of residents do not utilize.
Deborah Simmons can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...
- SIMMONS: Mandela: May the man of many roles rest in peace
- SIMMONS: Obama visits Southeast D.C. with minimum wage on his mind
- SIMMONS: Mayor Gray has only himself to outrun in campaign
- SIMMONS: Jack Kent Cooke's legacy continues to produce winners
- SIMMONS: Thanksgiving is about much more than gobble, gobble
Latest Blog Entries
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- EDITORIAL: Health care hardball
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- FENNO: Mike Shanahan's empty words no salve to free-falling Redskins
- POWELL: The Fed's scandalous monetary policy
- As the unemployed wait, lawmakers debate about extended benefits
- Sen. Rand Paul: Supreme Court needs to re-examine Fourth Amendment
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Al Maurer provides a common sense, conservatarian, Constitutional conservative perspective from the battleground state of Colorado
Film Reviews and Articles by Kevin Williams
"Critical thinking is thinking about your thinking while you're thinking in order to make your thinking better." - Dr. Richard Paul
Let it snow
White House pets gone wild!