- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
Panetta OKs some benefits for gay military couples
Defense of Marriage Act limits move
Question of the Day
“Taking care of our service members and honoring the sacrifices of all military families are two core values of this nation. Extending these benefits is an appropriate next step under current law to ensure that all service members receive equal support for what they do to protect this nation,” Mr. Panetta said.
The benefits include allowing gay domestic partners to visit their lovers in military hospitals and have notification and ceremonials rights in the event of a casualty.
In order to access those benefits, a service member and his or her partner must sign declarations attesting to the “existence of their committed relationship.”
Other benefits available to same-sex partners and their children include official identification as dependents of the service member, rights to use military stores without the service member present, and military child care and legal services.
In the memo ordering the change, Mr. Panetta said he expects the benefits would be made available as “expeditiously as possible” and a plan for implementation submitted to the defense secretary within 60 days.
However, legal limitations of the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman, prevent the Pentagon from providing all benefits, such as health care or housing allowances “at this time,” Mr. Panetta said.
The decision was celebrated by same-sex partners around the country.
“It’s a great step in the right direction,” said a newly engaged female Marine captain who chose not to be identified.
“This shows the [Defense Department] is faithful to those of us who have volunteered to serve even under the current restrictions, as we are faithful to our respective branches of service and country in return.”
Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, the senior Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, hailed the move as “another big step toward equality in the military.”
“Over the last few years, the Department of Defense has made great strides in moving our military toward equality,” he said, calling for legislation to ensure all benefits are extended for service members’ same-sex partners.
However, Rep. Duncan Hunter, California Republican and a member of the House Armed Services Committee, said he wants to see the Pentagon focus on Afghanistan and the looming defense budget, instead of gay issues.
“There’s enough on the plate already, and this is just another example of this [Obama] administration diverting its attention when it’s needed elsewhere,” a spokesman said.
Mr. Panetta’s decision is one of a series of controversial cultural actions taken made by the outgoing defense secretary.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq