The tea party, at its highest levels, is not ready to bestow its unquestioning love on one of the two Republican responders to President Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday — Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul or Florida Sen. Marco Rubio.
Mr. Rubio is delivering the GOP’s official response to President Obama, while Mr. Paul is delivering a response sponsored by the Tea Party Express.
“Both Rand Paul and Marco Rubio, from our standpoint, are elected officials who are fighting for tea party values of fiscal responsibility and constitutionally limited government,” Jenny Beth Martin, cofounder of the national Tea Party Patriots, told The Washington Times.
(SEE RELATED: State of Union response carries risk for Marco Rubio)
However, the Republican Party leadership’s choice of Mr. Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants, to deliver the official response marks him in the eyes of many fellow Republicans as the establishment’s chosen spokesman, and as such, acceptable as the 2016 presidential nominee if he decides to go for it.
**FILE** Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times) more >Whether that official seal of approval for the man Time magazine put on its cover as the “The Republican Savior” is more helpful than harmful to his political aspirations is questionable.
“Whether fair or not, the party’s choosing Rubio to give the official response makes him look like the establishment candidate and Paul as the guy who will stand up to his own party,” said former GOP Virginia assemblyman and former state GOP chairman Jeff Frederick.
Mr. Paul unofficially launched his 2016 nomination bid with a visit to Israel last month in the company of some 40 American evangelicals and several prominent Jewish Americans — with private side excursions by Mr. Paul to Jordan and Palestine.
(SEE RELATED: GOP honors Ron Paul; Rand takes own path)
For those closely monitoring his actions, it was no surprise that he elected to give what he calls his own “tea party” response to the president — or that he doesn’t explicitly deny that his move is an intentional clash with Rubio.
Mr. Paul, however, doesn’t view his speech as competing with Mr. Rubio but rather “as an extra response.”
View Entire Story© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Chief political writer Ralph Z. Hallow served on the Chicago Tribune, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Washington Times editorial boards, was Ford Foundation Fellow in Urban Journalism at Northwestern University, resident at Columbia University Editorial-Page Editors Seminar and has filed from Berlin, Bonn, London, Paris, Geneva, Vienna, Amman, Beirut, Cairo, Damascus, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Belgrade, Bucharest, Panama and Guatemala.
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

When you need to know who is making business, and what business is being made, you need the Business Browser.

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.

Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.