- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Review of ‘blah’ memoir wins Hatchet Job prize
LONDON (AP) - A critic who dismissed a divorce memoir as a stew of “vague literary blah” has won a prize celebrating the year’s most lacerating book reviews.
Camilla Long’s review of Rachel Cusk’s “Aftermath: On Marriage and Separation” for the Sunday Times newspaper was named winner of the Hatchet Job of the Year Award on Tuesday.
Long acknowledged finding the book _ in which Cusk, an award-winning novelist, recounts the breakdown of her marriage _ full of narrative gaps and “quite simply, bizarre.”
She described Cusk as a “peerless narcissist” and the book as “acres of poetic whimsy and vague literary blah, a needy, neurotic mandolin solo of reflections on child sacrifice and asides about drains.”
Cusk’s book was published last year to generally negative reviews, although The Daily Telegraph found it “full of beauty” and The Independent praised Cusk’s “honesty, courage, and the ability to depict her experiences in exquisitely crafted language.”
Long said that she hoped the award would encourage “thrilling, wild, exciting criticism.” Her prize consists of a golden hatchet and a year’s supply of potted shrimp from the award’s sponsor, a fishmonger.
The Hatchet Job award was established by literary website The Omnivore to honor “the angriest, funniest, most trenchant” review published in a newspaper or magazine.
Only in its second year, it has attracted wide attention in Britain, a country that loves a waspish turn of phrase.
While it has received some flak for rewarding mean-spiritedness, organizer Fleur Macdonald said the prize was intended “to encourage fearless and honest reviewing.”
And organizers insist they only pick on established writers strong enough to take it.
This year’s finalists included attacks on two of Britain’s most eminent novelists, Martin Amis and Salman Rushdie.
In the Washington Post, Ron Charles’ slammed Amis’ satirical saga “Lionel Asbo” as a “ham fisted novel” full of “blanched stereotypes.”
Zoe Heller’s critique of Rushdie’s memoir “Joseph Anton” for the New York Review of Books lambasted the author’s “magisterial amour propre” and concluded: “The world is as large and as wide as it ever was; it’s just Rushdie who got small.”
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- CHARLES: Holder's undermining of the law deserving of contempt
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- 'Deport Bieber' petition draws no comment from White House
- Critics rail against liberal bias for commencement speakers
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.