- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration
- White House urges GOP to act ‘urgently’ on $3.7 billion request for illegal immigrants
- Politicians, criminals using ‘right-to-be-forgotten’ law EU courts forced upon Google
- Combat fatigue: elite special forces troops are ‘fraying,’ Gen. Joseph Votel warns
- German foreign minister to meet Kerry to discuss spying claims
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: ‘Get yourself some firearms’
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Thank Team Obama for sequestration
Question of the Day
On March 1, unless legislation is passed to stop it, the “sequestration” goes into effect after having been delayed from the original deadline of Jan. 2. The sequestration calls for reductions in spending over a 10-year period in defense ($500 billion) and non-defense ($700 billion).
Every effort toward responsible fiscal restraint has failed. President Obama and Congress — mostly the Senate — have ignored the recommendation of the Congressional Budget Office, the Bowles-Simpson plan as well as the Rivlin-Domenici Deficit Reduction Plan. Even the supercommittee set up by the Budget Control Act of 2011 failed to come up with an agreement. That failure set up the sequestration deadline for automatic cuts of between $1.2 trillion and $1.5 trillion. Now the consequences of intransigence are the sequestration’s across-the-board cuts.
Congress has failed to not only keep our spending in check, but the Senate under Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, has refused to even put a budget together for the last four years. A budget is the first step in examining where spending should go and where smart cuts can be made.
Having run a business for many years, I know that when reductions in spending are necessary, a careful analysis and plan of action can prune waste and weakness and will eventually result in a stronger organization. When forced, managers can find cuts that may hurt in the short term but strengthen the organization over the long term.
The GOP has failed to obtain spending reductions in every confrontation with Mr. Obama so far. This time, they have the leverage to carve out a spending-reduction plan that could spark smart policies. If the Democrats refuse to provide the spending cuts needed, Republicans should hold the line and let the sequestration take effect.
CHRISTOPHER J. MOODY
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Senate majority leader practices politics of personal destruction
Get Breaking Alerts
- Pentagon's self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: 'We cannot afford to wait on Congress' for immigration
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- Obama seeks brisk passage of border children funding bill
- Bloomberg: Pro-gun towns must lack roads
- Va. Democrat reportedly seeks nude shots of Kendall Jones
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: 'Get yourself some firearms'
- PRUDEN: 'Dirty Harry' Reids increasing eccentricity
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: How many boondoggles to break the bank?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The problem is unenforced borders
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Where are condolences for Jewish teens' deaths?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama welcomes illegals, ignores Americans
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama has no intention of repatriating illegals