- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
- CDC sees measles spike and ‘failure to vaccinate’
- Ex-Secret Service agent seeking Md. seat: Everyone’s a ‘de facto criminal’ now
- New prosthetic hand technology lets amputees feel again
A fresh attack on sugar subsidies
Current Congress more likely to pass reform measure
On a biggest day of the year for candy hearts and chocolate kisses, a bipartisan group of lawmakers argued that conditions are right to finally rein in federal sugar subsidies.
Rep. Earl Blumenauer, Oregon Democrat, said at a Valentine’s Day Capitol Hill briefing Thursday that the current Congress is more likely to pass sugar reform, after efforts to overhaul the current system were defeated during the last five-year farm bill reauthorization fight in 2008. A bill to end sugar subsidies fell four votes short in the Senate last year, but opposition from sugar-growing states is considered stronger in the House.
“We don’t get this opportunity every year,” said Rep. Bob Goodlatte, Virginia Republican.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, New Hampshire Democrat and one of the main writers of the bill, said this time subsidy opponents say they have stopped short of seeking to do away entirely with subsidies for the sake of a stronger coalition.
“Our bill does not remove the safety net from sugar producers,” said Mrs. Shaheen.
Sugar industry advocates say that critics underestimate the number of U.S. jobs preserved by the price supports while overstating the losses in domestic sugar-using industries. They also argue that many U.S. sugar producers will go out of business if the current support system is junked.
But Mrs. Shaheen noted that the sugar industry was the only industry covered by the farm bill that did not receive any kind of modifications in 2008.
Several members at Thursday’s news conference cited Commerce Department estimates that, for every job saved by current sugar price supports, three manufacturing and food industry jobs are lost or at risk.
Rep. Joseph R. Pitts, Pennsylvania Republican, said the goal of the new bill was to bring a greater balance between producers and users. Currently, he said, U.S. consumers pay 30 percent more for sugar and products made with sugar than consumers outside of the United States.
Mrs. Shaheen said the price of American sugar has been rising since 2008, even though domestic sugar prices have dropped in recent months. Supporters see that trajectory as one more reason to move ahead on sugar reform. Sen. Patrick J. Toomey, Pennsylvania Republican, said it would be “completely inappropriate” for taxpayers to foot the bill on buying up surplus sugar.
“When you fight to protect something that is not worth fighting for, you lose other opportunities,” Mr. Goodlatte said.
“This is not a partisan issue,” added Mr. Pitts. “This is about fairness.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Budget negotiators look to federal workers for benefit concessions
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- New battlefront emerges in war between Republicans, tea party
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- Blast of winter weather heads to D.C. area
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Positive propaganda for a nation in peril.
White House pets gone wild!