- Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Army’s 3-D printed bombs will create ‘a whole new universe’ of deadly capabilities
- Hamas calls on Hezbollah to join in fight against Israel
- Senators to FIFA, others: Don’t reward Putin with the World Cup in 2018
- U.S. condemns Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza
- Obamacare shoots premiums up by 88 percent in California
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
- U.S. chemical sites vulnerable despite millions spent on security: Congress
- Driverless cars to hit the British streets by 2015
WILLIAMS: Moving from ‘We the people’ to ‘We the government’
Question of the Day
The president's State of the Union was -- to my pleasant surprise -- not partisan vitriol, but -- to my unpleasant lack of surprise -- a full-on liberal call to action. I noticed that there was comparatively little applause or enthusiasm for this State of the Union -- sort of like the lack of enthusiasm for the president around the country, as he was re-elected by just a 51 percent majority.
The president is out of ideas. His speech was typical Obama rhetoric: 1) quoting from an actually good speech delivered by an actually good president; 2) fetishizing the middle class; 3) romanticizing groups or collectives; 4) issuing startling threats of unilateral executive action; and, above all, 5) completely denying the reality of government-benefit spending.
He is rehashing not only his old ideas, but liberal ideas that were old decades ago. He wants to raise the minimum wage, or at least chain it to inflation. I can think of few ideas worse for job creation than this.
According to scholars David Neumark and William Wascher, two-thirds of minimum-wage studies found negative employment effects from minimum-wage laws. According to Mark Wilson of the Cato Institute, the minimum wage increases job turnover, discourages part-time work, discourages fringe benefits, increases inflationary pressure and encourages hiring illegal immigrants.
Liberals need to make peace with business. They can't have their secularist utopia and still have thriving job creation: it's one or the other. Businesses create jobs; nothing else does. You either help business or you hurt jobs. And if nobody has jobs, then you can't afford anything else.
On climate change, there is the same problem. There are two possible liberal solutions to less energy use: 1) tax it, or 2) mandate restrictions. Either way, you're killing business, and thereby killing jobs. When you kill jobs, you kill funding for everything else -- green energy, handouts, all the candy liberals give to the plebeians.
The loudest and most emotional part of the night was on gun control. Bringing human props with him, the president said gun violence victims "deserve a vote." But, of course, this is theatrics. There is no bill "on victims." The only thing to vote on is unconstitutionally restricting our rights.
Does the president not realize that he was not re-elected on gun control? He was re-elected saying almost nothing about guns. There is no mandate here, and the Democratic Party would be wise to pocket-veto the president's proposals. Just as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid accidentally tweeted (read: blurted out) his opposition to an assault-weapons ban, so too might many other Democrats find themselves caught between loyalty to the president and common sense.
He wants more spending -- 29 programs, in fact -- but he says it won't cost a dime. That must mean he wants to raise taxes. So much for the "fiscal cliff" deal. The consensus on the Hill is that they are "done" with taxes, at least until well after the Three Crises -- sequestration, continuing resolution and debt ceiling. All tax bills on the House side essentially have been tabled for now. But the president speaks as if he hadn't just raised taxes on the wealthy, and, in the White House's own words, imposed "the most progressive tax code in decades." Now he wants to chase the rich out of our country some more. There goes investment in the economy, there goes entrepreneurship, there goes charitable donations.
The poor logic is scary enough. Even scarier, the ignorance: "Our government shouldn't make promises we cannot keep -- but we must keep the promises we've already made." Does he not know what promises we have made? We have already promised $120 trillion that we do not have. The total value of all assets in the United States is around $90 trillion: We couldn't keep our promises if we sold the whole country on Craigslist.
Politicians who make this argument remind me of King Herod, afraid to renege on his promise to Herodias: If you make a stupid promise, you need to be honest that it was stupid.
Even scarier than the ignorance? The collectivism. The joy with which the president read phrases like "lands and waters that we, the public, own together." That's a lot more important than any awkward water-slurping by Marco Rubio. That's policy. We the people are now we the government.
Armstrong Williams is on Sirius/XM Power 128, 6 to 7 p.m. and 4 to 5 a.m., Monday through Friday/ Become a fan atfacebook.com/arightside, and follow him at twitter.com/arightside.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- HURT: Impeaching Obama is a losing strategy for the GOP
- MSNBC's Ronan Farrow questions lack of racial diversity in emoji characters
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world