- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
SEWALL:Culture’s shifting sands on moral standards
No more clear line on right and wrong?
Question of the Day
Sixty years ago juvenile delinquency and what to do about it suddenly drew a round of national soul searching. We no longer even use the term. We think in terms of juvenile monsters.
Yesteryear’s hoods and troublemakers seem quaint and innocent beside today’s appalling school murders, gang rapes and teenage mayhem.
Yet those bad boys and girls of the 1950s were not the doll-like, smiling, dancing John Travolta and Olivia Newton-John caricatures that Hollywood later concocted. They were the early warning signals of anomie – amped up 60 years later with rap lyrics, hardcore porn and violent video gaming.
After World War II, law-abiding Americans wanted their children to avoid contact with a bad juvenile element, even if it meant picking up and moving. Their fears were integral to the nation’s suburban explosion and the 1960s turn toward sunbelt conservatism.
Demagogues rose to political power exploiting worries that juvenile delinquency was a “highly contagious disease,” when it was in fact a forewarning of broad rebellion and cultural revolt.
Postwar rebels came in different regional shapes and flavors. “Catcher in the Rye,” first published in 1951, idealized a troubled 17-year-old in New York City, not exactly a delinquent but a very edgy young man. There was often a prurient angle. Grace Metalious’s runaway 1956 bestseller “Peyton Place” sold 32 million copies.
In 1955, Natalie Wood and James Dean starred in “Rebel without a Cause.” Two years later, “West Side Story” put gang wars to music on Broadway.
The demon of casual, wanton sex lurked most often behind the delinquency issue. Middle-class parents nationwide worried about their children, who had unprecedented freedom and access to cars. Illegitimate births were suddenly rising, especially in the ghetto.
Public figures got into the act. Anthropologist Margaret Mead, author of “Coming of Age in Samoa” (1928) and a largely forgotten figure today, was then on every progressive reading list.
Always eager for an audience, Mead toured the country, claiming that anti-social juvenile behavior was not a problem among adolescent Samoans because they had loose attitudes about sex. The celebrated Kinsey reports on America’s randy sex habits added fuel to the 1950s fire.
University of Chicago sociologist James Coleman later documented an emerging youth culture that no longer had proximity to older generations and seemed to prefer its own exclusive company at the expense of traditional authorities.
Out-of-wedlock births, divorce, desertion and homosexuality had been historically ostracized. Intact mom-and-dad families had been protected and privileged by law and convention. This would rapidly change, the eminent Harvard sociologist Pitirim Sorokin predicted, if America’s sexual obsessions continued to spiral upward.
An emergent Dionysian and “sensate” culture, Sorokin said, would lead to the collapse of traditional families.
Americans generally look at things differently today, applauding the changes in the traditional family since then. Promiscuity, premarital sex, extramarital sex, divorce, homosexual unions and out-of-wedlock births are normalized.
Another great Harvard sociologist, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who had drawn unwanted attention to family collapse in 1965, would finally conclude the nation could not – had to a large degree lost the capacity to — police wayward behavior.
TWT Video Picks
By Michael Widlanski
Leveling the battlefield to aid terrorists enables evil to fight on
Get Breaking Alerts
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Norway expects imminent 'concrete threat' from ISIL terrorists 'within days'
- State Department indicates Nouri al-Maliki's days numbered as Iraq prime minister
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Calif. dolls were meant to spread cheer, not chill
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report