- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: ‘Tolerance’ should extend beyond liberal borders
Question of the Day
I have to laugh at the silliness of the political correctness police. Charles Cunningham ("If 'Redskins' offends, so should other names," Letters, Wednesday) is correct when he writes, "The political correctness police have started their ritual (it happens about every 10 years or so)."
Apparently it is time yet again to fight the name "Washington Redskins." It seems people who know the least think and talk the most, and this is when they make fools of themselves. Apparently the folks who want the change think the name is racist. But the name refers to a cultural practice, not any race. American Indians were called "redskins" because in war they coated their skin with red pigment clay to embolden themselves and hopefully to frighten the enemy. Even a liberal who takes the time to look carefully will find American Indians do not have red skin.
When I am offended, the left instructs me to be more tolerant and inclusive. This goes both ways. So it is time for all of us to be more tolerant, especially the easily offended left. As a culture, we have to stop asking "How high?" when a politically correct person tells us to jump. It's time to stand firm and reject silliness, or this culture war will never stop.
FRED C. SEBLY
Mount Airy, Md.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
Get Breaking Alerts
- Calling sentence disparities unfair, Obama pardons 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness