- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help me with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
Driver’s licenses for illegals spark another debate
Supporters tout the fiscal benefits for Maryland; opponents cite undeserved privilege
Question of the Day
A year after giving many of Maryland’s illegal immigrants the right to in-state college tuition, some state lawmakers want to give them improved access to driver’s licenses in a move that supporters say could have fiscal benefits and would bring residents in the state illegally out of the shadows.
A bill in this year’s General Assembly effectively would repeal the state’s 2009 law that bars new driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants and others who are unable to document their citizenship.
Maryland would join a handful of states that allow licenses for undocumented immigrants. Supporters of the plan say that immigrants often have no choice but to drive because of family and work obligations, and that denying them licenses does more harm than good by putting more unlicensed and uninsured motorists on the road.
“I believe this is for the good of the state of Maryland,” Sen. Victor R. Ramirez, Prince George’s Democrat and lead sponsor of the bill, said. “It would help protect our highways and roads in the state of Maryland, and it would help law enforcement identify people more readily and faster.”
If the bill passes, Maryland would join Washington, New Mexico and Illinois — which passed its law last month — as states that allow driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants.
Utah allows a special driving privilege card, while many other states, including Maryland and Virginia, have said they will begin allowing licenses for young illegal immigrants who qualify for the work waivers being implemented by the Obama administration.
Mr. Ramirez’s legislation would allow residents who can’t prove their citizenship to obtain a special license that would allow them to drive but would not be an acceptable form of identification in other venues such as airports and federal buildings.
Maryland explicitly outlawed licenses for illegal immigrants in 2009, when lawmakers passed legislation to help the state comply with the federal Real ID Act of 2005, which sought to place tighter regulations on state driver’s licenses but has since been caught in delays and implemented by few states.
The state’s law included a grandfather clause that allowed illegal immigrants and other undocumented residents who had licenses at the time of the law’s passage to keep them until July 2015.
Opponents of Mr. Ramirez’s bill argue that it affords another privilege to residents who aren’t legally in the country and that it could decrease their incentive to seek proper citizenship.
But supporters contend that banning licenses accomplishes nothing and just leads many people to drive without insurance or proper training. The result is more accidents, which can escalate to hit-and-runs if the driver fears being caught without a license, and to higher insurance costs for law-abiding drivers.
They also say the plan could bring the state $7 million a year in additional driver’s fees and that IDs could help police to keep track of illegal immigrants and find any potential criminal histories.
“We know that a large number of those people without proper documentation to be in the country are, in fact, driving,” said Montgomery County Executive Isiah “Ike” Leggett, a Democrat. “They carry their kids to school, they work, they attend a large number of activities.”
The proposal has solid support in both chambers of the assembly, with 15 of 47 senators co-sponsoring the Senate version and 60 of the House’s 141 delegates lending their names to their version of the bill. All sponsors are Democrats.
But Republicans and even some Democrats worry that the proposal could backfire and make Maryland a more attractive draw for new illegal residents, just as New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez, a Republican, says has happened in her state.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Hill joined The Washington Times in February 2011 as a Maryland political reporter. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Md. drivers could face eventual doubling of gas tax
- Federal appeals court restores Maryland's concealed carry law
- Md. bill would end student suspensions for mimicking gun behavior
- Maryland Senate passes bill decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana
- Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell assailed on transportation
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq