- President Obama poised to grant clemency to nonviolent drug offenders: report
- Teen OK after riding in wheel well of Hawaii jet
- Kraft recalls 96K pounds of Oscar Mayer hot dogs over cheese error
- Boy Scouts boots church as host after gay leadership dispute
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s new book raises 2016 presidential speculation
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Rep. Marsha Blackburn: Hillary Clinton won’t be first female president
- French president accuses Syria’s Assad of gassing his own citizens
- Jimmy Carter’s grandson makes gains in governor’s race in Georgia
- Yemen: Airstrike targets al Qaeda training camps
Illinois vote seen as a bellwether on gun control; Jesse Jackson Jr.’s seat an early test
Tuesday’s primary for Chicago-area Democrats voting to replace former Rep. Jesse L. Jackson Jr. could be the first indication of whether gun control will take center stage in next year’s congressional races.
In a field of ideologically similar candidates running in a heavily Democratic district, the top contenders have staked out distinctly different positions — and drawn national attention in the process.
Former state Rep. Robin Kelly has unapologetically touted herself as a pro-gun-control candidate, while former Rep. Deborah L. Halvorson — whose “A” rating from the National Rifle Association was used against her by Mr. Jackson when he defeated her in last year’s primary — is seeing a deluge of outside money coming in to oppose her.
New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s anti-gun super PAC, Independence USA, has dumped about $2 million into advertising to oppose Ms. Halvorson and state Sen. Toi Hutchinson, who has won support from the NRA in the past but now supports a ban on some semiautomatic weapons and high-capacity magazines. Ms. Hutchinson abruptly dropped out of the race recently and endorsed Ms. Kelly.
The candidates are trying to replace Mr. Jackson, who pleaded guilty last week to a felony charge related to misuse of $750,000 in campaign funds. He is scheduled to be sentenced in June, and prosecutors recommended a sentence of about four years in prison.
“I’m part of the public,” Mr. Bloomberg told reporters recently. “I happen to have some money, and that’s what I’m going to do with my money — try to get us some sensible gun laws.”
Vice President Joseph R. Biden said recently that there has been a wide assumption that gun control is a “third rail” for politicians — but that the dynamic has changed since the shooting deaths of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.
“[I]f you’re concerned about your political survival, you should be concerned about the survival of our children,” he said. “And guess what? I believe the price to be paid politically will be to those who refuse to act, who refuse to step forward, because America has changed on this issue.”
A bipartisan group of senators — Democrats Charles E. Schumer of New York and Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, along with Republicans Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Mark Kirk of Illinois — is reportedly within striking distance of a deal to strengthen background checks on virtually all gun sales.
But a major sticking point is the extent to which records would be kept on gun owners; for example, what, if any, documentation might accompany cases such as family heirlooms being passed down from father to son or friends loaning one another guns on a firing range.
“I don’t think we’re that close to a deal, and there absolutely will not be record-keeping on legitimate, law-abiding gun owners in this country,” Mr. Coburn said on “Fox News Sunday.” “And if they want to eliminate the benefits of actually trying to prevent the sales to people who are mentally ill and to criminals, all they have to do is create a record-keeping, and that will kill this bill.”
NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre warned over the weekend that universal background checks are the first step toward a national gun registry — a point disputed Sunday by Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“I mean, your local gun store has to pay taxes to the community, to the state and fill out all these rules and all, why should they have to have stiffer rules on them than somebody who comes in and sets up in the fairground for a week?” he said in an appearance Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
He dismissed concerns that background checks would lead to a gun registry, saying the records would be destroyed, as long as gun purchasers are truthful.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Michael Bloomberg charts $50M challenge to NRA: 'Got to make them afraid'
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
- Obama urged to enforce ban on importing military-style firearms
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- CURL: Shelly O first lady Michelle Obama comes in last
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Building a D.C. memorial for an endless war bumps into regulations
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- No rush: Bob Goodlatte waits for heads to cool on heated legislation
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.