- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
Looking for budget cuts? GOP suggests checking out Obamacare
Republican lawmakers say the costs of implementing President Obama’s health care law represent a ripe target for money-saving cuts, as Congress fights over the best way to avert an automatic and indiscriminate budget ax set to come down Friday.
But the Obama administration is unlikely to allow the president’s top domestic achievement to suffer much more than a glancing blow from the so-called sequester.
The two agencies most responsible for carrying out the Affordable Care Act’s reforms — the Department of Health and Human Services and the Treasury Department — make no mention of the law in letters they sent to Senate appropriators to outline the dire effects of the automatic cuts, or sequesters. Rather, health care officials called attention to sharp reductions in HIV testing, medical research at the National Institutes of Health and clinical care for American Indians and Alaskan Natives.
Even so, the contentious law known as Obamacare may not escape unscathed.
“These large and arbitrary cuts will have severe impacts across the government,” HHS spokesman Bill Hall said. “The sequestration law impacts all affected discretionary programs, so any such programs under [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] or the ACA would be impacted.”
For example, the federal grants designed to help states set up insurance marketplaces, or “exchanges,” in the states under Mr. Obama’s law would be subject to 7.6 percent cuts totaling $66 million, according to estimates issued in September by the Obama administration's Office of Management and Budget.
The Prevention and Public Health Fund — a state-by-state fund set up by the health care law to proactively fight disease and illness — also would be subject to the sequester to the tune of $76 million.
Those projections were made before additional wrangling over the sequester, including a last-minute New Year’s deal to avoid the “fiscal cliff.” Now, the sequestration calls for an annual reduction of roughly 5 percent of nondefense programs and 8 percent for defense programs, Mr. Hall said.
“However, given that these cuts must be achieved over only seven months instead of 12, the effective percentage reductions will be approximately 9 percent for nondefense programs and 13 percent for defense programs,” he added.
The exchange program is a key pillar of Mr. Obama’s law and designed to help those without employer-based health plans buy insurance with tax credits starting in 2014. More than half of the states have asked the federal government to run their exchanges for them, while others are performing the task in-house or are partnering with the federal government.
Despite the looming sequesters, one Senate Republican aide said Monday that the president’s signature health care reforms are “definitely well-insulated.”
“Their problem is the task, not money,” the aide said of the administration’s efforts to roll out key aspects of the law in the coming months.
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey told The Washington Times this week that implementation is behind schedule, so it makes sense to delay it.
His comments echo those of high-profile Republicans, who have taken to the Sunday talk shows to call on Mr. Obama to delay his reforms or offer them as bargaining chips in the bitter dispute about how to rein in the nation’s deficit.
“Just delay the [Medicaid] expansions, delay the health care exchanges so they can work with states on waivers, on flexibility,” Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal said last weekend on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” arguing that it would save tens of billions of dollars “and you’re not even cutting a program that’s started yet.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Russia should be booted from FIFA World Cup, senators say
- New tool helps figure Obamacare penalties
- Tax-prep firms pitch in, cash in on Obamacare
- Obama tries to reassure Hispanics on Obamacare
- Half of uninsured look to Obamacare exchanges for coverage
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- BRUCE: Obama's bizarre immigration rules
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- IRS to turn over Lerner emails in tea party targeting probe
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again