- No mas: Principal bans Spanish language in intercom announcement
- Hacking software could put ‘zombie drone army’ in user’s hands
- Support for stricter gun laws drops: poll
- 10 whales dead, 41 others stranded in Everglades
- John Boehner faces bipartisan pressure to allow gay-rights vote
- Martin Bashir resigns from MSNBC over ‘ill-judged’ comments about Sarah Palin
- Rep. Duncan Hunter: While Obama prays for Iranian change, U.S. should ready its nukes
- Best company ever? Veteran Beer Co. exists to employ vets, provide quality beer
- Iran official: Sanctions ‘utterly failed’ to stop nuclear program
- ‘Black Santa’ display at IU sparks student outrage
HAGELIN: Free speech rights don’t apply if liberal crowd takes offense
Liberals love the First Amendment. Except when they hate it.
Recently I wrote in my regular Washington Times Monday column, “How To Save Your Family,” a piece lamenting the confusion created by gender-bending fashion models and the emerging sentiment that little children somehow show their true, transgendered selves when they show “inquisitiveness about the other sex, and all the trappings of male or female life.” I cited a leading expert on children and gender dysphoria, Kenneth Zucker, who believes that children who seem confused about their gender identity should enter therapy with the goal to “understand themselves better” and figure out “what might be causing them to develop what I call a ‘fantasy solution,’ that being the other sex will make them happy.”
I ended my column by encouraging parents to affirm their child’s masculine or feminine identity, because “God made us male and female and that’s something to celebrate.”
And for speaking that truth, the homosexual activists have mounted a vicious campaign to silence me.
The Washington Times is under attack for carrying my column. The paper has been barraged by demands from homosexuals/transgenders and their supporters that my column be banned. And my inbox has been flooded by hateful mail from this same crowd who seek to intimidate and silence me. It’s ironic that my critics exercise their free speech by writing the publisher and using the media to criticize my words, but would deny me the same rights.
This is what passes for tolerance in Obama’s America?
I’ve seen this before. It’s not the first time the homosexual lobby has tried to shut me down.
Last year, I spoke in Australia at an event celebrating National Marriage Day where I warned against the dangers of destroying the concept of marriage as a union between one man and one woman. My speech prompted outrage from homosexuals and calls for me to be silenced for my “damaging” remarks.
The left’s intimidation campaign shows no respect for our First Amendment right to free speech — or for the rights of all Americans. They want to gag anyone who rises in the public square to speak against sexual immorality (or even to criticize liberal fiscal policy). Whether it’s reciting biblical injunctions against homosexual behavior or encouraging parents to teach their children traditional moral views, or arguing the morality of record spending deficits, it’s all got to go — according to the intolerant left.
Homosexual activists strike a particularly strident tone that goes something like this: If it’s hurtful, it’s hateful, so shut up. And if you don’t, we’ll sue you, call you names, run you out of town, and take away your right to speak.
It’s the same campaign of intolerance and intimidation that enraged homosexuals have carried out against the Boy Scouts, businesses like Chick-fil-A, radio talk show hosts and religious leaders.
A few years ago, FamilyTalk (www.MyFamilyTalk.com) radio host and world-renowned psychologist James Dobson predicted that hate-crimes legislation would “be the first step to criminalize our rights as Christians to believe that some behaviors are sinful.” (Full disclosure: I serve on the board of Mr. Dobson’s organization.) Well, just this past week, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled that criticisms of homosexual behavior are not protected under Canadian free-speech laws and can be considered hate speech. Incredibly, the Canadian judges ruled that “courts have recognized a strong connection between sexual orientation and sexual conduct and where the conduct targeted by speech is a crucial aspect of the identity of a vulnerable group, attacks on this conduct could stand as a proxy for attacks on the group itself.”
But not in America, right?
Right now, the illiberal left is engaged in unprecedented attempts to shut down the exercise of free speech in this country. Instead of embracing the public square as a forum to debate the merits of competing ideas, the voices of intolerance would ban “offensive” arguments and ideas precisely because they do oppose the “party” line.
By Tom Harris and Madhav Khandekar
Bad science puts rich nations on the hook for trillions in climate liabilities
- Angry NTSB ousts railroad union from N.Y. train crash site
- Hola: Boehner prepares to push amnesty bill through House
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- Puerto Rico caravan honoring Paul Walker ends in 6 drunken-driving arrests, 72 speeding tickets
- Apple wins facial recognition patent for iPhone 6
- Xbox One, Playstation 4 games penalize users for cursing in their own homes
- First Dog Sunny knocks down Ashtyn Gardner; Michelle Obama yanks leash
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- HURT: Postal Service misses address by a whole continent
- Allen West warns Obamas backdoor gun control is moving forward
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Does it take over 25 years in public service to really know what goes on in Washington?
Despite cynicism about the law, it can provide you justice, protection, and ensure your rights.