White House spokesman Jay Carney said that drone strikes on Americans, under certain circumstances, are constitutional.
They are sometimes “necessary to mitigate ongoing attacks,” he said, according to a report in The Hill. They are “fully consistent with our Constitution,” he reportedly added.
The statements came in response to questions at a White House press conference Tuesday, in which Mr. Carney was asked to clarify a Department of Justice memo about drone strikes that targeted U.S. citizens.
Mr. Carney said the president’s priority “first and foremost” was to protect U.S. citizens, The Hill reported. But under certain circumstance — when fighting al Qaeda, for instance — “all necessary military force” can be used, including drone strikes on Americans, he said, The Hill reported.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Cheryl Chumley is a continuous news writer for The Washington Times. Previously, she was part of the start-up team for The Washington Times’ digital aggregation product, Times247. She’s also a 2008-2009 Robert Novak journalism fellow with The Phillips Foundation. She can be reached at cchumley@washingtontimes.com.
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A carefully guided tour through the confusing world of modern bookselling and publishing.
Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.
“Right Angles” explores serious subjects, such as the Islamization of the Middle East and delegitimization of Israel, with humor, candor and a twist.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
13 Photos
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
18 Photos
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
11 Photos
