Pakistani ambassador: Drone strikes are ‘counterproductive’
“Drones are actually seen as a very negative [action] … and give an unfortunate view of U.S. power and how the United States projects its power abroad.
“It is also operationally counterproductive because it creates more potential terrorists on the ground instead of taking them out,” Ms. Rehman said. “If it is taking out a high-value or medium-value target then it is also creating an entire community of future [terrorist] recruits.
“We need to drain the swamp and instead what [the drone strikes have done] is radicalizing people.”
“There is no question of any quiet complicity, no question of wink and nod. This is a parliamentary red line,” she said.
U.S. and Afghan officials say Pakistan provides sanctuaries as well as material support to terrorist groups such as the Haqqani Network that operate from tribal regions along its northwest border with Afghanistan.
“We do not perceive it to be an active sanctuary,” Ms. Rehman said. “We are doing what we can to restrict the operational space for terrorists in our tribal areas. It is hard to interdict on that border if the other side remains unmanaged.”
The Taliban ruled Afghanistan from 1996 until 2001 when they were toppled in a U.S.-led invasion for hosting al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
In their talks in Britain, Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari agreed to a six-month deadline to work out arrangements to get a peace process moving.
The Taliban ditched the process in March last year, citing U.S. inaction on its demand to release five high-value detainees at the U.S. military detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.