- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Citizens must defend themselves
I have been following with interest the renewed debate about firearms ownership. The truth is that the Second Amendment has been undermined for generations as though the phrase “shall not be infringed” does not exist within it.
Governments at all levels ignore that phrase by requiring their permission to buy, own, possess or carry firearms of any type. That is infringement by any definition. Perhaps that sounds radical, but the non-infringement phrase is stated by the Constitution in plain, simple language. As an Army officer, I swore to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic — and my oath cannot be ignored. I am always amazed at the inability of some elected people to read and understand simple words and phrases. Our citizenship entails rights and responsibilities, among them the right and obligation to defend oneself, one’s family and one’s property.
I am a believer in and support the efforts of law enforcement. I know from experience that we can never afford to hire enough officers or deputies so they can be where they’re needed in order to prevent crime. Given the limited number of law enforcers we can afford, the time delay of calls for help will almost always place law enforcement in a clean-up and investigative role. As a result, citizens must always be prepared to protect themselves, whether by meeting the threat head-on or by evading it until help arrives. The advent of modern thought, equipment or methods does not relieve citizens from their obligation to defend all of their rights as provided in the Constitution.
For those who at every turn ignore the founding documents, I would advise them to look to the Constitution for the proper method for modifying it. The proper procedures are included within that document.
LEWIS E. BAGGETT
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Vietnam says it may have found door of missing Malaysian jet as intel look into stolen passports
- CPAC 2014 straw poll results
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- PIPES: Islam's inadvertent adverse effects on adherents
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- Italy outraged over U.S. gun dealer's 'David' ad
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults