- Tennessee ammunition site explodes, killing 1
- U.N.: Iran cuts stock closest to nuke-arms grade
- Oklahoma gay-marriage case before U.S. appeals court
- Times wins two awards from Society for Professional Journalists
- Marionville mayor ‘kind of agreed’ with Kansas City shooter’s views
- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Teen taking selfie by train: ‘Wow, that guy just kicked me in the head’
- Goodbye, Afghanistan — hello, Africa: Air Force to shift as U.S. exits Middle East
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Citizens must defend themselves
I have been following with interest the renewed debate about firearms ownership. The truth is that the Second Amendment has been undermined for generations as though the phrase “shall not be infringed” does not exist within it.
Governments at all levels ignore that phrase by requiring their permission to buy, own, possess or carry firearms of any type. That is infringement by any definition. Perhaps that sounds radical, but the non-infringement phrase is stated by the Constitution in plain, simple language. As an Army officer, I swore to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic — and my oath cannot be ignored. I am always amazed at the inability of some elected people to read and understand simple words and phrases. Our citizenship entails rights and responsibilities, among them the right and obligation to defend oneself, one’s family and one’s property.
I am a believer in and support the efforts of law enforcement. I know from experience that we can never afford to hire enough officers or deputies so they can be where they’re needed in order to prevent crime. Given the limited number of law enforcers we can afford, the time delay of calls for help will almost always place law enforcement in a clean-up and investigative role. As a result, citizens must always be prepared to protect themselves, whether by meeting the threat head-on or by evading it until help arrives. The advent of modern thought, equipment or methods does not relieve citizens from their obligation to defend all of their rights as provided in the Constitution.
For those who at every turn ignore the founding documents, I would advise them to look to the Constitution for the proper method for modifying it. The proper procedures are included within that document.
LEWIS E. BAGGETT
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- With pot and e-cigarettes, Big Tobacco is just waiting to inhale emerging markets
- FISHER: Shades of Berlin in the South China Sea
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- Removal of military gear limits options for U.S., NATO in Ukraine
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Muhammad wouldn't condone Boston bombing
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: High heels: Hazardous to one's health?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Marshall's comments hurt GOP, pro-lifers