- Sen. Rob Portman: Math is on GOP’s side to win Senate this fall
- Four-time deportee arrested for molesting 9-year-old Texas girl
- Private investigators turn to drones to catch marital cheaters, insurance liars
- Sleep issues can accelerate Alzheimer’s, while mental exercises can delay it, study shows
- IPad metal — nickel — faulted for causing allergic rashes
- Rand Paul to Rick Perry on Iraq: Get some new glasses
- ‘Fact-Checker’ blog takes on Dems for their comments on Hobby Lobby decision
- Babe Ruth’s 1918 contract sells for $1.02M at auction
- Citigroup to pay $7B to settle subprime mortgage case
- Archie to be shot saving gay friend in comic book
Concession on birth control not sufficient, bishops say
Affiliates still not free of mandate
Question of the Day
America’s Catholic bishops on Thursday rejected President Obama’s latest contraception mandate upon religiously affiliated hospitals, schools and charities, saying the rules still don’t ensure that people won’t be forced to pay for contraceptives to which they morally object.
Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said he appreciated the Health and Human Services Department’s latest effort to try to work out a compromise that lets women obtain free birth control without religiously affiliated organizations having to pay for it. But Cardinal Dolan said it still doesn’t treat religiously affiliated charities and other groups the same as churches and temples themselves.
“HHS offers what it calls an ‘accommodation’ rather than accepting the fact that these ministries are integral to our church and worthy of the same exemption as our Catholic churches,” he said.
The administration’s latest offer was an attempt to end a public and politically draining dispute for Mr. Obama with the nation’s Catholic hierarchy, one that has spilled over into the courts. But finding a workable middle ground has been difficult for both sides.
Under Mr. Obama’s health care law, most employers are required to provide health insurance that provide women with free contraceptive coverage, including sterilization and access to morning-after pills that some ethicists say amounts to abortion.
Houses of worship are exempt, but religiously affiliated employers, such as Catholic universities or hospitals, are not.
Last week, the Obama administration announced a long-awaited proposal that would have insurers or third-party administrators provide contraception coverage through separate policies without the religious nonprofits’ involvement.
Health care officials said insurance providers would be reimbursed for the coverage through rebates on the user fees tied to participation in health care exchanges in the states, which will take effect next year under Mr. Obama’s health care law. Plus, officials said, a reduction in pregnancies often makes the coverage cost-neutral. Progressive Catholic groups and the Planned Parenthood Federation of America praised the plan.
“Are we really at a point where everything the Obama administration touches makes the bishops take their marbles and go home?” said James Salt, executive director of Catholics United, accusing the bishops of “scoring political points for the far right.”
Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards said it is “becoming clear that some people just will not rest until they have found a way to deny women access to birth control coverage.”
But Cardinal Dolan said it is “still unclear how directly these separate policies would be funded by objecting ministries, and what precise role those ministries would have in arranging for these separate policies. Thus, there remains the possibility that ministries may yet be forced to fund and facilitate such morally illicit activities.”
He also said the rules don’t help devout workers at religiously affiliated organizations who cannot opt out of plans that offer contraceptive care.
The rules also don’t apply to for-profit companies with owners whose religious or moral beliefs oppose the use of artificial contraceptives.
More than a dozen corporations have sued the Obama administration over the contraception mandate, saying it violates their right to religious freedom.
The owners of Hobby Lobby stores, the best-known company among the corporate plaintiffs, announced last month that they had figured out a way to delay the start of their insurance year, putting off massive penalties that were to kick in at the start of the year for refusing to provide free birth control.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Sen. Rob Portman: Math is on GOP's side to win Senate this fall
- Fla. man accused of leaving boy, 7, in hot car
- Scott Brown campaign ad focuses on vets, says Shaheen and Obama have failed
- Sleep issues can accelerate Alzheimer's, while mental exercises can delay it, study shows
- 'Fact-Checker' blog takes on Dems for their comments on Hobby Lobby decision
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Robert N. Tracci
Congress must use its appropriations power to secure the border
- DOJ investigates Nebraska parade float critical of Obama
- Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi formerly a U.S. captive
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- A 'new Cold War': China's top paper warns of 'slippery slope' towards conflict with U.S.
- CURL: The hypocrisy of Obama's 15-day Vineyard vacation
- Sen. John McCain on illegal child immigrants: Fly them home, now
- EDITORIAL: The faux farmer in the Senate race in Iowa
- Agency scrubs Malia Obama photos at White House's request: report
- Eric Holder: 'Racial animus' fuels opposition to Obama and me
- Obama's 'blank check' rejected as border solution
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs