Secretary of State John F. Kerry brushed aside questions Friday about why President Obama refused to embrace a plan from top advisers to send weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad, saying he instead wants to look ahead to future policy challenges.
The plan to arm some rebels, backed by former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and former CIA Director David Petraeus, divided the Obama White House, which has been struggling with what role the U.S. can play in trying to bring an end to the nearly two years of bloodshed in Syria.
“This is a new administration now, the president’s second term,” said Mr. Kerry. “I’m a new secretary of state, and we’re going forwards from this point.”
Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta revealed on Thursday that he and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey had also originally backed the plan to send weapons to Syrian opposition rebels — before the White House blocked it.
Testifying to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday, Mr. Panetta said there “were a number of factors that were involved” in Mr. Obama’s ultimate decision not to go through with the plan, but to instead make U.S. assistance to the rebels “nonlethal.”
“I supported his decision in the end,” Mr. Panetta said. He is expected to soon retire as defense secretary.
Channeling aid into Syria has presented political and strategic challenges for the Obama administration, which has expressed concerns about the presence of Islamists among those battling the regime of Mr. Assad.
Administration officials say they fear that U.S. aid could end up in the wrong hands.
“There is too much killing, there’s too much violence, and we obviously want to try to find a way forward,” Mr. Kerry said.
He added that there are “serious questions” about the “Al Nusra” fighting front in Syria — an organization that has already been designated a terrorist organization by the United States — and he said he was worried about “AQI, al-Qaida from Iraq, coming in, and other violent groups on the ground.”
“It is a very complicated and very dangerous situation,” Mr. Kerry said. “And everybody understands it is a place that has chemical weapons, and we are deeply concerned about that.”
The newly confirmed secretary of state suggested, however, that the Obama administration, is still struggling to ascertain the best way forward.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Guy Taylor rejoined The Washington Times in 2011 as the State Department correspondent.
As a freelance journalist, Taylor’s work was supported by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting and the Fund For Investigative Journalism, and his stories appeared in a variety publications, from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch to Salon, Reason, Prospect Magazine of London, the Daily Star of Beirut, the ...
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
We all eat, and food should be fun and healthful. Food Commune celebrates the food we eat, the people we eat with and the spirits we enjoy.
First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.
A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.
Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall