Hundreds of people gathered Thursday at the Smithsonian's National Museum of the American Indian for a discussion of sports teams’ use of racially insensitive imagery that, as such discussions often do, turned into an ongoing complaint against a certain Washington football team’s continued use of a certain Indian-inspired nickname.
Few seats were empty in the Rasmuson Theater at the museum, which hosted a daylong forum to discuss the stereotype perpetuated by American Indian mascots, who is to blame for their use, and how — or whether — the practice can be stopped.
Much of the discussion focused on the Washington Redskins.
“What better common bond can you have than a sports team you want to support wholeheartedly,” said Robert Holden, deputy director for the National Congress of American Indians. “But I cannot in good conscience support the local football team. We cannot feel a sense of community in that regard.”
The franchise has used the name Redskins since 1933, when the team played in Boston. Officials have said they have no intention of changing the name, which has been the subject of a long-running federal trademark lawsuit and several popular resolutions by local government bodies.
During a press conference before the Super Bowl, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell acknowledged that the team name can spark affection and anger, but that Redskins owner Dan Snyder was proud of the name and its heritage.
“I believe fans are, too,” Mr. Goodell said. “I also understand the other side of that. I don’t think anybody wants to offend anybody.”
“I don’t think the owners understand that they’re not honoring us,” Mr. Holden said. “If they’re still saying that, please, take it back. Honors like that we don’t need, we don’t want.”
E. Newton Jackson, a professor of sports management at the University of North Florida, said that one reason some fans have resisted changing the name is that they confuse loyalty to the name with loyalty to the team.
“A lot of institutions have not quite accepted the dialogue that there are some issues with race and ethnicity,” he said.
The issue around the Redskins‘ name recently flared up after several commentators called on the team to change it. D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray during a recent press conference avoided using the word “Redskins” while discussing whether the team would ever call the District home again and added that before any hypothetical move back to the District, he would want to sit down with the team to discuss whether a change could be made.
Eileen Maxwell, spokeswoman for the American Indian museum, said the forum had been scheduled for November but the gathering was canceled as a result of Superstorm Sandy. She said the discussion on the Redskins‘ name was not originally on the agenda, but after the recent attention, forum organizers decided to “go for it.”View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Meredith Somers is a Metro reporter for The Washington Times. She can be reached at email@example.com.
By Rand Paul
Obama acts as though we no longer have a Constitution
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Sometimes life requires a paradigm twist.
News and reviews of notable museums, and exhibits, and art events.
Nobody likes to talk about dying quite as much as life insurance expert Liran Hirshkorn.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc