- ‘Gay Jeans’ that fade into rainbow-colored denim created
- Divided court strikes down big porn award
- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
- L.A. sheriff admits to testing flyover spy program without notifying residents
House GOP doesn’t flinch from the fight
House Republicans faced blistering criticism from all sides Tuesday as they once again threatened to scuttle a bipartisan package blessed by the White House and Senate Republicans — but they remained undaunted, and many even said they relished the fight even as the deal ultimately headed toward passage.
“I know the president won his election, but I also won my election,” said Rep. Spencer Bachus, Alabama Republican.
Hours earlier, the Senate overwhelmingly backed an agreement to let taxes rise on the wealthiest, and to extend many of President Obama’s key stimulus spending programs. And House Democrats said they, too, were ready to follow suit and approve the deal.
But House Republicans balked, leaving the deal — and the fate of the Bush-era tax cuts, expanded unemployment benefits, and Medicare doctors’ payments — in flux.
Rep. Mike Conaway, Texas Republican, feigned disbelief when asked whether he was worried that amending the package might unwind a bill crafted and passed in agonizing fashion.
“Am I, as a House Republican, worried about a deal struck by the President and the Senate?” Mr. Conaway asked. “No.”
It’s the latest in a long line of roadblocks that House Republicans have put in the way of Mr. Obama’s agenda since they took control of the chamber two years ago.
Republicans have become the chief targets for Mr. Obama and fellow Democrats, who have compared them to an unruly mob unwilling to compromise.
Rep. Louise McIntosh Slaughter, New York Democrat, lambasted the Republican majority from the House floor Tuesday evening, calling the process an “utter disgrace” and saying it illustrated “a need for the majority to come back to the bargaining table in good faith.”
But House Republicans declared that they weren’t going to cave to Democrats’ demands, nor were they going to accept a bill just because it was blessed by Senate Republicans.
Rep. John Fleming, Louisiana Republican, said Mr. Obama campaigned and won re-election on a platform of raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans, but that spending cuts were supposed to be part of that package.
“The president will take to the cameras, and he’ll say that we’re going to stand in the way of progress for the nation and all that,” he said. “So every time we use a leverage point, the president uses that against us, as he did the other day — puts his supporters behind him, applauding him on everything he says, and so obviously, he’s able to push his will. The problem is, we’re going [in] the wrong direction. I think everyone in this country knows that we can’t continue spending irresponsibly as we have.”
House Republicans were particularly angry that they are being caught in a year-end jam. They say they passed bills months ago to avert the fiscal cliff — the combination of tax increases and spending “sequesters” due this week — and said it’s the Senate that’s been dragging its feet.
But in mid-December House Republicans seemed to blunder when their leader, Speaker John A. Boehner, tried to power through his Plan B, a combination of some small tax increases and a full replacement of the sequesters. A conservative rebellion forced Mr. Boehner to shelve the plan and punt over to the Senate, which acted early Tuesday morning, with little more than two full days to go before the current Congress dissolves.
“What the Senate amended has been sitting over there for months,” Rep. Steven C. LaTourette, Ohio Republican, said of the bill the Senate sent over at 2 a.m. Tuesday. “And so the fact that they decided to finally get off their keisters and send us something, and now we have 45 hours to act — I don’t think that reflects badly on the House.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Supreme Court pushes consideration of N.J. gun case to April 25
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Michael Bloomberg charts $50M challenge to NRA: 'Got to make them afraid'
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
- Harry Reid using tax dollars to fight Koch brothers, La. GOP chair charges
- Georgia governor signs bill expanding gun rights
- Russian bombers buzz U.K. airspace; jets scrambled to chase off 'Bears'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014