- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
Embassy Row: ‘Better together’
Question of the Day
Seven hundred years after a vastly outnumbered Scottish army under legendary King Robert the Bruce defeated the English in a battle for Scottish independence, Scotland next year will again tackle the issue of separating from England.
However, the question facing Scots in 2014 will be settled at the ballot box, not on the battlefield, and Henry McLeish, a former Scottish premier, predicts the outcome will be different.
“It’s better together,” he said on a visit to Washington last week, as he boosted the benefits of preserving the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Mr. McLeish was here to promote a new Scottish social-media network called “myclanonline.com.”
A Labor Party activist and former member of the British and Scottish parliaments, Mr. McLeish doubts that the pro-independence Scottish National Party will have enough support to break up the union established in 1707.
He concedes the referendum could be closer than it now appears. About 60 percent of Scots oppose independence, although many support greater home rule.
“The unionist vote is now at a high-water mark,” he said.
Mr. McLeish still foresees a defeat for the referendum by a ratio closer to 55 percent against and 45 percent for. “It’s unlikely that independence will be approved, but the question is: What comes next?” he said. “Scotland wants vastly expanded powers.”
The Scottish Parliament reconvened in 1999, nearly 300 years after Scotland and England dissolved their legislatures to create the British Parliament in London.
But the Scottish Parliament has limited jurisdiction, similar to the powers of a U.S. state government. Scotland can regulate its own judicial, educational and health systems, but it has no control over foreign policy and only limited taxing authority.
In October, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond agreed on the terms for an independence referendum. The Conservative Mr. Cameron, like the liberal Mr. McLeish, oppose the breakup of Britain.
Mr. Cameron persuaded Mr. Salmond to agree on a referendum that poses only the question of independence. The Scottish leader had supported a second question that would have given Scotland more powers.
The independence question presents a challenge to NATO, which has a nuclear submarine fleet based on Scotland’s River Clyde. Mr. Salmond’s party opposes nuclear weapons and wants the fleet relocated from Scotland.
The relationship between Scotland, with 5 million people today, and England, with a population of 53 million, has been tense since the Middle Ages, when English kings such as Edward I invaded to subjugate the Scots.
The Scottish Wars of Independence — depicted in the largely fictional film “Braveheart” — reached a landmark at the Battle of Bannockburn on June 24, 1314. Robert the Bruce defeated Edward’s son, Edward II, even though the Scots had far fewer than half of the strength of the English army of about 18,000 men.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
James Morrison joined the The Washington Times in 1983 as a local reporter covering Alexandria, Va. A year later, he was assigned to open a Times bureau in Canada. From 1987 to 1989, Mr. Morrison was The Washington Times reporter in London, covering Britain, Western Europe and NATO issues. After returning to Washington, he served as an assistant foreign editor ...
- Embassy Row: India strikes back over diplomat's arrest
- Embassy Row: India 'shocked,' 'appalled' by consular officer's arrest
- Wife of jailed U.S. Christian in Iran calls for White House help
- Embassy Row: Wife of Christian held in Iran feels abandoned by Obama
- Senate debate: Is Santa Claus an American citizen?
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- EDITORIAL: For too many gays, 'tolerance' is a one-way street
- PRUDEN: Cooling the manufactured impeachment panic
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- Feds accept boredom, lack of work as excuses for surfing porn on clock
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world