- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- ISTOOK: IRS “wants to throw us in jail,” says tea party leader
- Easter woes: Chocolate costs soar, becoming ‘unaffordable’ luxury
- Michaels craft chain confirms hackers hit 3M customers
- Special Forces’ suicide rates hit record levels — casualties of ‘hard combat’
- Many Americans would quickly face financial hardship after losing job, poll shows
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Second Amendment is our last line of defense
Thanks for publishing Judge Andrew P. Napolitano’s excellent piece underscoring that the rights of individuals trump the rights of the state — and more specifically, the right of individuals to defend themselves from the oppression of an unjust state (“The right to shoot tyrants, not deer,” Commentary, Friday).
Self-defense is indeed required not only against criminal violence but also against tyranny — the state’s denial of the citizenry’s sovereignty. It needs to be emphasized in the discussion that liberty of the press and the right of self-expression, enshrined in the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment, should take care of that. Indeed, a properly functioning free press should investigate and report any wrongdoing by the government before the government takes catastrophic measures of any sort.
But what if the press does not fulfill its role? This is exactly what is happening nowadays with the media being more of a lapdog of the government than a watchdog.
It is not understood that all democracies have in their constitutions a right to free expression. The problem is that when the press becomes a lackey of government, protection against tyranny is lost. On the other hand, the United States recognizes the right to bear arms. Even if the First Amendment is compromised, the Second will persist. This is a worthy feature of American exceptionalism.
It is the intellectual’s viewpoint to believe that free expression and a free press will secure our liberty from government. It is the common man’s stance that when all else fails, the ultimate protection is one’s own ability to defend oneself, one’s family and one’s property. It is this population that knows better than to rely on free speech alone when the intellectuals begin to threaten their freedom.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- Immigration still on hold: Boehner's office
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- PRUDEN: When a bored president just 'mails it in'
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- BRUCE: Obama deliberately emboldening America's enemies
- Joe Biden's biggest gaffe: VP blowing his 2016 head start
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Probe Boston teen's medical, custody case
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support a modern-day Tiananmen protest
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: An honorable president would resign
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable