- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
Gun-control advocates say Obama is too late
Question of the Day
The big-ticket items in President Obama’s push for action on gun control will require the approval of Congress, but many of the 23 executive moves he announced Wednesday could have been taken at any time in his first term — a point that nettles those who have been advocating for stricter measures.
“It’s a disgrace that it hasn’t been done until now,” said Richard E. Gardiner, a lawyer based in Northern Virginia. “I didn’t see anything in here that they couldn’t already have been doing and in fact that the pro-gun people have been encouraging for years.”
Mr. Gardiner cited specifically improving disclosure of criminal and mental health records — an area where the National Rifle Association, the nation’s most powerful gun lobby, had been spending its own money to help states seeking to update their records.
Activists have been calling for years for Mr. Obama to force federal agencies to send more data to the instant background check system, and he could at any time have ordered all of the reviews he called for at Wednesday’s news event.
The administration defended its timeline by saying officials needed the time and careful study Mr. Biden gave the issue before they could decide what actions to take.
“It’s not as though we had a policy paper sitting on the shelf waiting somewhere,” said a senior administration official, speaking on background during a conference call briefing before the proposals were unveiled. “We met with a lot of groups and we learned a lot of ideas that came as a result of this process, so we’ve tried to be as comprehensive as possible.”
Sandy Hook was the latest in a series of shootings on Mr. Obama’s watch, including last summer’s rampage at a midnight showing of “The Dark Knight Rises” in Aurora, Colo.
But those on both sides of the debate acknowledge that the Connecticut shooting, which left 20 first-graders and a half-dozen school officials dead, gave Mr. Obama a political opening.
Rep. Peter T. King, New York Republican, said Mr. Obama this week seemed to downplay the Colorado movie theater shooting, which happened in the midst of the presidential campaign. Mr. King said it made him wonder how committed Mr. Obama is to the issue.
“The fact that it was not even mentioned during the campaign, or hardly mentioned, shows that this is not a selling political issue. It really isn’t,” he told CNN. “I wonder how serious he really is. I’m not questioning his motives, but he never mentioned it during the campaign. And now he knows that for the next two months all we’re going to be talking about is the debt ceiling, sequestration, the continuing resolution, you know, the ending of the fiscal year, all of these.”
The 23 actions Mr. Obama laid out on Wednesday included providing incentives for states to share information with the national background-check system, hiring school resource officers and addressing unnecessary legal barriers that may be preventing states from providing information to the federal background system.
Mr. Biden, who led the task force on gun violence that crafted recommendations for Mr. Obama and met with more than 220 groups, acknowledged Thursday that mental health privacy issues are inherently sensitive — and not necessarily for the usual suspects.
He said pro-gun advocates are more inclined to support disclosure, while the “anti-gun guys” are more reluctant, citing privacy issues. But he said the time has come to take action.
“We have to look at it,” he said. “We have to address it.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Buyers form trusts to get guns that are off-limits
- Support for stricter gun laws drops: poll
- Scientists could unlock mystery of life beyond Earth within a decade
- House Democrats give grudging support to 10-year gun ban extension
- Extending plastic gun ban just first step?
Latest Blog Entries
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Chris Matthews: GOP less patriotic than South African white apartheid leaders
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'Economic Freedom Zones' for Detroit
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
White House pets gone wild!