- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
- U.N. warns of Muslim ‘cleansing’ in Central African Republic
- Senate blocks change to military sex assault cases
- Drug mix may have cured child born with HIV, doctors say
- De Blasio’s wife irks former mansion chef with ‘servant’ remark
- Russia’s neighbors shiver amid Putin’s Cold War moves in Ukraine
- New SAT: The essay portion is to become optional
- Military group can’t march to honor the fallen at Boston Marathon due to security changes
- Senate passes bills deleting ‘retarded’ from laws
- China announces biggest military hike in 3 years: We are not ‘boy scouts with spears’
MILLER: An offer Harry Reid can’t refuse
House GOP offers ‘no budget, no pay’ for short-term debt-ceiling increase
Harry Reid has successfully avoided showing his cards on spending priorities for four years. The Senate majority leader has adamantly refused to bring a budget to the floor in order to leave Republican priorities hanging out as a political pinata to beat up during the campaign. The latest GOP plan, which is up for a vote in the House on Wednesday, will force the Nevada Democrat to lay his cards on the table.
The proposed legislation authorizes the Treasury to borrow as much as it needs through May 18, without any offsetting reductions in spending. In return for that generous concession, the legislation gives the House and Senate a deadline of April 15 to pass a budget. If either chamber fails to do so, paychecks for the delinquent members would be deposited in an escrow account until the lawmakers adopt a joint budget resolution.
House Speaker John A. Boehner announced this plan after meetings with his conference at their retreat last week, telling them, “The principle is simple: no budget, no pay.” President Obama is still refusing to negotiate over the debt ceiling, but the latest plan is getting a warm reception. “The fact that the House Republicans have made this decision is certainly something that we welcome,” said White House press secretary Jay Carney on Tuesday.
The idea of tying member salaries to getting their work done originated from the grass roots. Freshman Rep. Mark Meadows made the idea of “no budget, no pay” a central theme of his campaign.
As the North Carolina Republican explained in an interview with The Washington Times, the salary ultimatum shows the public “we are willing to live by the same rules as hardworking taxpayers.” The current situation, in which the House passes a budget every year without the Senate doing the same, renders negotiations the equivalent of “I’m talking to myself in the mirror,” said Mr. Meadows.
A Rasmussen poll Tuesday found 81 percent of Americans agree that Congress should take a 25 percent pay cut until the budget is balanced, but Mr. Obama wants even higher salaries. On Dec. 27, he signed an executive order granting $11 billion in pay raises to government employees, including Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Cabinet secretaries and members of Congress.
Capitol Hill lawmakers voted to overturn their own pay increase in the debt-ceiling deal at the beginning of the year, and House Republicans plan to vote soon on overturning the rest of the government pay hikes.
There’s reason to be concerned Republicans have surrendered the principle of dollar-for-dollar spending cuts. Many solid conservative members, however, are satisfied the three-month increase in borrowing is worth trading for the chance to stop Mr. Obama from claiming Congress isn’t paying its bills.
“We use the debt ceiling as a vehicle for us to get a budget with meaningful spending cuts, which is our top priority,” explained Mr. Meadows.
The president’s use of seniors and the military as human shields to protect his spending binge has worked, unfortunately. The scare tactics have limited the Republican appetite for temporarily shutting down non-essential government functions to force needed reforms. If the latest idea succeeds in forcing Mr. Reid to agree to a spending blueprint with his House colleagues, the added transparency should help encourage a bit of spending restraint.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: CPAC debates Tea Party or moderate for 2016 Republican presidential candidate
- MILLER: Huge majorities on East Coast support national gun registry
- MILLER: NRA to score Senate vote on Obama’s nominee for surgeon general, Vivec Murthy
- MILLER: New Jersey bill is outright gun ban on .22-caliber rifles and leads to confiscation
- MILLER: California attorney general tries to overturn gun carry ruling in 9th Circuit
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Get Breaking Alerts
- Back to the Future: HUVr Tech marketing video goes viral with hoverboard release tease
- Aronofsky's 'Noah' banned in Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- Russian lawmaker wants to outlaw U.S. dollar, calls it a Ponzi scheme
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- Two liberals say Sarah Palin is right: Obama lacks substance
- MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: Bush to blame for Ukraine
- 1M kids stop school lunch due to Michelle Obamas food standards
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's flawed Mideast 'peace' plan
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Foreign policy would distract Obama from social hour
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Hit Putin where it hurts over Ukraine