- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
GOP divided over Obama’s Medicaid money offer
Republican-led states grapple with whether to expand access
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer shocked many observers this month by opting to expand the Medicaid program in her state as part of President Obama’s health care law, saying it was a good economic deal, even as her Republican counterparts in states like Georgia flatly rejected the option.
Seven months after the Supreme Court gave the green light to states to decide whether to greatly expand the federal-state health program for the poor, many Republican-led states are still grappling with whether to do it.
Under Mr. Obama’s law, federal dollars would pay 100 percent of the expansion’s cost for three years, starting in 2014, before scaling back Washington’s contribution to 90 percent by 2020.
Some state officials, such as Ms. Brewer in Arizona, say they’ve crunched the numbers and have concluded that a minimal state investment can earn tremendous returns from federal coffers. But others, including Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal, said the numbers don’t look so good for them, and that judging by past performance, they don’t trust the federal government to meet its commitments anyway.
“If you think your taxes went up a lot this month, just wait till we have to pay for ‘free health care,’” Mr. Deal told state lawmakers earlier this month. “‘Free’ never cost so much.”
The Medicaid question is proving to be a deeper quandary for conservative-minded states than the other major decision related to Mr. Obama’s reforms —whether or not to set up a virtual marketplace, or “exchange,” for residents to shop for health insurance plans.
If states decline to set up exchanges, the law calls for the federal government to come in and run them. Many Republican-led states had chosen the federal option, arguing they don’t want to be on the hook for bad decisions.
But in considering the Medicaid question, GOP leaders must weigh their constituents’ needs against their bedrock principles of limited spending and self-reliance without federal intrusion.
“Those who do not accept the Medicaid expansion will have to give up the very attractive subsidies and leave many of their poorest uninsured,” said I. Glenn Cohen, a health care expert at Harvard Law School.
In Arizona, Ms. Brewer said that the injection of federal dollars could boost the local economy, and she said Arizona would scale back its enrollment if the federal match dropped below 80 percent in future years.
“Ultimately, the decision came down to the math,” said Ms. Brewer’s spokesman, Matthew Benson, who noted that if Arizona doesn’t sign up, other states will get its money. “Our taxpayers are paying the freight for this program, so we might as well get some of the benefit.”
Unlike Ms. Brewer, some GOP governors say the price tag for “Obamacare” is simply too steep. Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant called on his state to lower its Medicaid population through economic growth instead of “assuming enormous costs we cannot afford.”
But Mr. Cohen, at Harvard Law, said it seems unlikely that individual members of Congress would vote to “shaft” their own states by withdrawing federal Medicaid funds down the road, especially since Democrats on Capitol Hill would be unlikely initiate such a move.
“That means that Republican governors essentially think that their Republican federal representatives and senators are going to pull the rug out from under them, and that is why they don’t want to adopt the expansion,” he said. “That seems implausible to me.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Sebelius not running for Senate, HHS confirms: Report
- Red fox makes a home for himself at the White House: Report
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- Sen. Joe Manchin keeps his options open for 2016
- Many Americans would quickly face financial hardship after losing job, poll shows
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Study: Children fare better in traditional mom-dad families
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.