- Atheists’ Easter taunt to Christians: ‘Jesus is a myth’
- Miley Cyrus hospitalized, cancels Kansas City show
- Josh Romney swipes Harry Reid with photo tweet of dad paying taxes — ‘your paycheck’
- Despite Obamacare problems, some Dems want Sebelius to run for Senate: report
- Angry New Yorkers shred gun registrations in deadline day protests
- Uninsured rate dropping faster in places that embraced pillars of Obamacare, survey shows
- Hawaii, D.C. give residents two more weeks to sign up under Obamacare
- Climate change causing fish to lose their minds, researchers say
- Great Britain tops World’s Most Sexist Nation list
- Aaron Hernandez investigated for threatening to kill prison guard
Mugs seen as crime solvers
D.C. Council member Cheh wants police to release photos
A D.C. lawmaker is looking to end the Metropolitan Police Department’s long-standing ban on the release of mug shots of people who are arrested — a move she hopes will increase the likelihood of solving other crimes.
With Tuesday’s introduction of the bill, D.C. Council member Mary M. Cheh, a constitutional law professor, is wading into territory that has split U.S. appeals courts and state attorneys general.
“When you see someone’s picture, it may offer the opportunity to connect a person up with other crimes,” said Ms. Cheh, Ward 3 Democrat. “It allows us to connect a string of crimes in a way we otherwise wouldn’t.”
Citing a hypothetical example, Ms. Cheh offered the scenario of a crime victim who gets a good look at the perpetrator and later sees a mug shot of the same person, allowing police to link the suspect with another offense.
All of the jurisdictions surrounding the District — Prince George’s County, Montgomery County, Fairfax County, Arlington County and Alexandria — regularly make mug shots available on their police department websites. However, the District, keeping in line with the Department of Justice, has a practice of not releasing mug shot photos.
“Photos of suspects and defendants are typically not released except for law enforcement purposes, such as seeking fugitives,” said William Miller, spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office, which prosecutes crimes committed in the District.
A spokeswoman for the Metropolitan Police Department did not address written questions about the reason for the department’s policy or offer any indication on whether it would oppose the Mug Shot Access Act, which would make booking photos of an arrested person available to anyone upon written request.
“We have not reviewed the legislation and therefore cannot comment, at this time,” police department spokeswoman Gwendolyn Crump said in an email statement.
Court rulings have allowed for different practices among law enforcement agencies across the country.
The U.S. courts of appeal in the Denver-based 10th and Atlanta-based 11th circuits have ruled that federal authorities may withhold mug shots of federal prisoners from the public. The Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled that booking photos must be released under Freedom of Information Act requests.
While supporters argue that the publication of mug shots can increase public awareness and safety, use of mug shots for commercial purposes has drawn criticism.
Websites and print newspapers dedicated to the dissemination of mug shots now specialize in forms of local crime voyeurism. For such publications, mug shot photos are gleaned from information released publicly by law enforcement. Some, like the website Bustedmugshots.com, offer free access to mug shots across the country but will charge a $98 “administrative fee” for the removal of a mug shot.
In Utah, a county sheriff has compared the practice to “extortion” and said this month that he no longer would make mug shots available on the Salt Lake County Jail’s website.
Others, such as the Oklahoma-based OK Jailbirds newspaper, are sold for $1.50 an issue, offering the names, photos and criminal charges of people who have been arrested.
After a push by David Reid, publisher of OK Jailbirds, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt issued an opinion last month stating that the release of a mug shot does not constitute an invasion of privacy and that they must be released to the media or anyone else who requests a photo.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Andrea Noble is a crime and public safety reporter for The Washington Times. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Wal-Mart forced to apologize for 'mistake' favoring English-speaking shoppers
- EPA: District has second-most energy-efficient buildings
- D.C. autonomy bills introduced in Senate
- Ambitious legislation would reform traffic ticketing procedures
- Bill would loosen medical marijuana restrictions in D.C.
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By returning to Christian roots, the nation can achieve greatness once again
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- HURT: Wilson and Obama ... 100 years apart, but so alike
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Al Qaeda mocks U.S. in 'extraordinary' Yemen gathering; experts fear CIA caught flat-footed
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.