- Venezuela’s Maduro calls on student ‘price vigilantes’ to hit the streets, report businesses
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Bow before Valkyrie, NASA’s ‘superhero robot’ entry in DARPA challenge
- 10-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for pretend bow-and-arrow shooting
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Budget deal to get quick vote in the House
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro ‘marriage’
- Sebelius calls for review of Obamacare rollout woes
- American dream dying, but many see free market as solution: Poll
- Air Force base in South Carolina boots Nativity scene
WILLIAMS: Setting the record straight on the King children
Usually, I like to use this space to start a conversation about the political and social issues facing our country as a whole. I try to focus on issues that either explicitly or implicitly affect everyone.
And so it might be a surprise to some people that I want to address a very specific controversy: the slander of the family of Martin Luther King Jr. This might not seem like it is everyone’s business, but the King family is a major part of our national history, and slander is a necessarily public injustice. Undoing this injustice must in turn be public.
Columnist George E. Curry has published an article called “Greedy King children at it again,” which is nothing more than a hit piece. In the column, Mr. Curry said that the King family is charging people for the use of the famous “I Have a Dream” speech.
Bernice King has made it clear to me emphatically that no school was ever charged a royalty nor was any school ever sued for using that speech. “In reviewing the past records and files, I have never seen any indication that such events happened before.” Whereas King had a dream, now his children have a nightmare.
There is a legitimate — but unrelated — personal dispute between the Martin Luther King Jr. National Memorial Project Foundation and the King family. That needs to be discussed, but bringing in false allegations contributes nothing.
I don’t deny that the King family is a family of human beings after all, and no family is perfect. But I think we can all sympathize with them. I cannot imagine the pressure they all feel to live up to the legacy of their parents. Imagine the weight of the legacy of that great man. They must live every aspect of their lives in full public view, with people ready to attack them no matter what they do or whatever position they take. That would be difficult for anyone.
It was not the King children who established royalty rights to all of the civil rights leader’s work. This was done specifically by Martin Luther King Jr. and his wife for the benefit of their children. Furthermore, the rights affect only those who seek the commercialization and profit off the work of King. And isn’t that entirely reasonable? The King family is not charging people for, say, educational usage of their father’s work.
Wouldn’t you want your children to reap the benefits of what you had sown? Don’t we all want to leave something behind for people to benefit from after we are gone? The Kings were well aware that their work was important but dangerous, and just as well aware of the possibility that their children might grow up without a father, and with a mother who was significantly dedicated to her husband’s cause and legacy. The rights to the works of the parents were their gift to their children, an inheritance, because they knew that they would be forced to grow up and survive in a world completely without privacy. I think any of us in that situation would want the same thing for our children.
They are good people, believe me, and they are doing the best that they can. For Mr. Curry to spread the falsehood that the King family is charging schools for the “I Have a Dream” speech is not only wrong, but hurtful and embarrassing to these good people. I can’t imagine how they must feel, growing up with their father taken so prematurely from them, and then receiving calumny, being treated like misers for wanting their patrimony, like anyone else would.
As we as a nation marked Jan. 21 another Martin Luther King Jr. Day — and a very special one, with the second inauguration of the first black president — is this really the kind of negativity that King would want? King marched to bring people together because of their common humanity, not to see his followers divided and feuding. I hope that we can unite our community, our churches and our country behind the universal humanitarian message of that great preacher, that great American hero, Martin Luther King. His is a message for all people, a message of peace and authentic hope, born of faith.
• Armstrong Williams is on Sirius/XM Power 128, 7-8 p.m. and 4-5 a.m., Monday through Friday. Become a fan at facebook.com/arightside, and follow him at twitter.com/arightside.
About the Author
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- Leon Panetta named as source of 'Zero Dark Thirty' scriptwriters information
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Gov't Motors: Obama fudges math on auto bailout, $10.5 billion loss for taxpayers
- More than a quarter million sign up for Obamacare in November
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
An objective, analysis-based perspective of D.C. sports as seen through the eyes of lifelong D.C. sports enthusiast, John Heibel.
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Human interest stories to feed interest, satisfy curiosity and see outside the box.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow