LAMBRO: Surreal world of Obama tax hikes

Debt deal will only depress economy further

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Let’s be clear about what the “fiscal cliff” deal does and doesn’t do.

It permanently preserves the bulk of George W. Bush’s tax cuts for most Americans, but it does not offer desperately needed new incentives to revive a weak economy and jobless labor market.

On the contrary, the eleventh-hour compromise is marred by higher taxes that will hinder further growth, cost hundreds of thousands of jobs and make life even tougher for many Americans barely surviving paycheck to paycheck.

This deal, which elicited effusive praise from President Obama in the wee hours of New Year's Day, would increase the top income tax rate from 35 percent to nearly 40 percent on individuals and small businesses earning more than $400,000 and couples making more than $450,000. Tax credits will begin phasing out on lesser incomes, too, for individuals and small businesses earning more than $250,000, thus raising their taxes as well.

It also will hit investors, the people whose money helps build businesses and create jobs. Investment tax rates will rise from 15 percent to 20 percent on stock dividends and capital gains.

At a time when venture capital — the mother’s milk of a prosperous, job-creating economy — remains in short supply, this is no time to be raising taxes on it. If anything, we should be cutting the capital gains tax rate to unlock capital that has been sitting on the sidelines in order to spur stronger growth and jobs.

Throw in the temporary expiration of the 2 percent Social Security payroll tax cut for every worker (raising it to 6.2 percent), and the “result of the deal, would make for the largest increase in taxes in about half a century,” The Washington Post said Tuesday.

Yet there was Mr. Obama, just after the Senate vote of approval, saying that raising tax on investors, business and every American worker “is the right thing to do for our country.”

This isn’t good for either our country or our economy. These are among the worst things we could do at a time when the economy is barely growing at 2 percent and so many workers are struggling to find full-time employment.

Mr. Obama said this would help cut the budget deficit, which is on track for a $1 trillion-plus deficit for the fifth consecutive year. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Spending reductions were put off until early March by the agreement, but don’t hold your breath.

Mr. Obama’s new taxes will not produce the added revenue he expects, either. Instead, higher rates will weaken the economy to the point where tax revenue will fall further or at best remain flat, ensuring a line of record deficits as far as the eye can see.

Throughout the battle over the fiscal cliff, Mr. Obama rarely has talked about economic growth, nor has he dealt with it in any substantive or effective way in his policies over the past four years. For him, this is all about raising taxes on the wealthy, his obsessive, all-purpose cure for what ails us. The budget deficit? Raise taxes on the rich. The national debt? Raise taxes on the rich. A weak economy? Raise taxes on the rich. Unemployment? Raise taxes on the rich.

The economic evidence is clear that his politically driven class warfare and big-spending, soak-the-rich fiscal policies have failed on every count.

Consumer confidence has dropped sharply. Retail sales were weak in November and disappointing in December as well. Unemployment is still skirting 8 percent in the fifth year of Mr. Obama’s presidency with little relief in sight.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

About the Author
Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro is the chief political correspondent for The Washington Times, the author of five books and a nationally syndicated columnist. His twice-weekly United Feature Syndicate column appears in newspapers across the country, including The Washington Times. He received the Warren Brookes Award For Excellence In Journalism in 1995 and in that same year was the host and co-writer of ...

Latest Stories

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts