- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
Gay-marriage supporters turn focus to Illinois
See potential for 10th victory
Question of the Day
Gay-marriage supporters on the hunt for their 10th victory are eyeing Illinois as a likely candidate and several other states as strong possibilities.
Nine states and the District perform and recognize same-sex marriages, while 30 states have voter-passed constitutional amendments against it.
In Illinois, one of several states that offers civil unions to gay couples, Democratic political leaders, including President Obama, U.S. Sen. Richard J. Durbin, Gov. Pat Quinn and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, have urged state lawmakers to adopt gay marriage instead.
Last week, an Illinois state senate executive committee approved a bill authorizing gay marriage. Due to the short, lame-duck schedule and missing lawmakers, however, proponents could not bring the bill for a floor vote.
The November elections gave Illinois Democrats supermajorities in both state chambers, and “mathematically speaking, it would be definitely possible to pass the bill without Republican support,” Mr. Cherkasov said.
Previous gay-related laws, though, have been enacted with bipartisan support, and there will be strong efforts to win Republican votes for gay marriage, he said. In the recent Senate committee vote, Mr. Cherkasov added, the Republican minority leader said that while she couldn’t vote for the gay-marriage bill yet, she “looks forward to building bipartisan support for the bill.”
In Illinois, the House has 118 members, 71 of whom are Democrats; 60 votes are needed to pass a gay-marriage law. In the Senate, there are 59 members, 40 of whom are Democrats; 30 votes are needed to pass a law.
Robert Gilligan, executive director of the Catholic Conference of Illinois, promised that “strong, grass-roots opposition” would continue against gay-marriage legalization efforts.
Illinois Democrats are not in lockstep on this issue — at least six Democrats “were vocally opposing” gay marriage in the lame-duck session, said Mr. Gilligan.
“We were able to articulate grave concerns about the legislation. So that’s what we will continue to do, and we will hope and pray that lawmakers will see our side and we will be able to stop it,” he said.
Catholic, Lutheran, Anglican, Muslim, Mormon and other pastoral leaders representing 1,700 Illinois religious groups sent a letter Wednesday to all 177 lawmakers, asking them not to view marriage as “an emotional bond between any two adults.”
Marriage between a man and a woman is the “natural basis of the family,” they said, and there is “real peril” that, under a gay-marriage law, individuals and religious organizations will be compelled to support it, in violation of their consciences and religious liberties.
Illinois gay-rights leaders, however, are determined to win their state.
“Whether next week, next month, this spring or in the months ahead, freedom to marry for same-sex couples will be won in the Illinois General Assembly or in the courts,” said John Knight, who handles gay issues for the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois. His organization is representing some of the dozens of gay couples who have gone to court to repeal the Illinois state law that outlaws gay marriage.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- JAMA opinion piece calls for ending lifetime ban on blood donation by gay men
- HIV rate drops in U.S. for most groups; percentage for young gay, bisexual men up
- VH1's 'Naked Dating' outrages parents group
- Justina Pelletier talks to Republican lawmakers
- EEOC aims to stop discrimination against pregnant women
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
The president could pay the full price for ignoring Congress
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- BERMAN & MADYOON: An Iranian-Turkish reset
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- Pentagon team dispatched to Ukraine amid crisis with Russia
- Ron Paul: U.S. partly to blame for Malaysia Airlines disaster
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- Gen. James Amos, Marine Corps commandant, slams Obama's handling of Iraq
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq