- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
Debt, funding fights show no signs of easing for new Congress
The bitter partisan fights on taxes and spending that dominated the past Congress — highlighted by the “fiscal cliff” battle — likely will continue to boil this year.
Several big money issues left by the previous Congress are coming due in a few weeks, most notably automatic across-the-board spending cuts, an expiring stopgap measure to fund federal agencies and the need to find more space under the government’s encroaching debt ceiling.
With President Obama’s budget due in February and broader tax reforms on everyone’s to-do list, 2013 is shaping up to be a busy year for congressional appropriators and tax writers.
Yet whether lawmakers can rise above the partisan fray and pass any long-term and meaningful fixes is anyone’s guess.
Among the first major fiscal challenges facing the 113th Congress is how to avoid the “sequester” spending cuts scheduled to kick in March 1. The series of cuts in federal spending — delayed two months as part of the eleventh-hour deal to avoid the fiscal cliff in the new year — would reduce the budgets of most agencies and programs by 8 percent to 10 percent.
The cuts were conceived in the 2011 debate over the debt ceiling with the idea that instituting a “trigger” of such deep, indiscriminate across-the-board cuts would force both parties to work together to find better ways to attack the problem of the federal debt and deficit.
Both parties loathe the sequester, though for different reasons. Republicans insist on cuts in expensive entitlement programs such as Medicaid while resisting defense cuts. Many Democrats are open to trims in Pentagon spending but are fiercely protective of social welfare and entitlement programs. Neither side has shown a willingness to budge.
Lawmakers also must figure out a way to keep the federal government funded through the year or risk a politically perilous government shutdown. Congress failed to pass a yearlong spending plan last year, forcing lawmakers to implement a six-month stopgap — known as a continuing resolution — in late September in order to avert a government shutdown when the current fiscal year began Oct. 1. That temporary measure expires March 27.
House and Senate appropriations committee leaders say they are determined to craft and pass a spending plan for the rest of fiscal year 2013, which ends Sept. 30. Republicans particularly abhor stopgap measures because they generally keep spending rates at the status quo, robbing them of an opportunity to cut what they consider to be wasteful, redundant and obsolete programs.
“Funding the government in short increments — without addressing the details for each program — is not the right way to govern and not something that should be common practice,” House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers, Kentucky Republican, said on the chamber floor last year.
But with partisan gridlock showing no signs of abating, speculation persists that the new Congress simply will extend the temporary spending measure through September instead of doing the heavy lifting needed to create a new plan.
Without a budget
Meanwhile, Congress is required by law to pass a budget for fiscal year 2014 by April 15, then write the annual spending and tax laws to carry out the budget’s targets.
That didn’t happen in 2012 for the third straight year, as Senate Democrats refused to take up the House Republican-drafted budget while failing to offer a plan of their own. The last time the Senate passed a budget was in 2009, when Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress and the White House.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- John Boehner demands answers on NSA, phone records
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- Inside the Beltway: A new interest in Rahm Emanuel for 2016?
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- Brennan: Russia 'absolutely' could invade eastern Ukraine
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Atheists sue to remove 'Ground Zero Cross' from 9/11 museum
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- HURT: John Kerry The ridiculous face of a ridiculous U.S. diplomacy
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again