- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
Panel OKs plebiscite on budget autonomy
Elections board rebuffs advisory opinion of D.C. attorney general
Question of the Day
The D.C. Board of Elections on Tuesday rejected arguments from the city’s top lawyer and will let voters decide this spring if they want to divorce the city’s local budget from the spending process on Capitol Hill — a long-sought goal known as “budget autonomy.”
The board’s decision came a day after D.C. Attorney General Irvin B. Nathan reluctantly implored the board to be “courageous” and to deny a proposed charter referendum from the ballot, even if it would be a politically unpopular stance. He said the measure is legally unsound and could create a backlash from members of Congress.
“A yes vote on [the question] will free D.C.’s local tax dollars from a dysfunctional Congress,” said James Jones, a spokesman for the D.C. Vote advocacy group, which is backing the referendum. “Our local tax dollars should not be held hostage by people we did not elect to serve.”
Mr. Nathan, who served as general counsel to the House of Representatives from 2007 to 2011, told the elections board it pained him to testify against the referendum, since he thinks the city deserves the right to spend its locally raised revenues.
But, he said, he took an oath to uphold the law. The measure does not pass legal muster and could result in a political backlash from members of Congress who view the move as an encroachment on their oversight powers, he told the board.
While it may be an unpopular decision, Mr. Nathan said, the denial would be better for the District in the long run as it attempts to achieve budget autonomy through legislation on the Hill.
Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, a Democrat, said the referendum was designed to be a “two-track” effort alongside legislative attempts on the Hill. One such attempt, led by Rep. Darrell E. Issa, California Republican, has stalled since 2011, because conservative lawmakers tried to attach measures to the bill that would alter the city’s abortion and gun laws.
Mr. Issa’s staff has indicated the congressman thinks local officials are free to put forward the referendum, but warned that potential legal challenges could delay their mutual efforts to achieve budget autonomy for the District.
The council’s lawyer, V. David Zvenyach, told the board on Monday that city lawmakers have the right to put forward the ballot question without interference from the elections board, which is not a court.
The charter referendum, if successful, will force Congress to actively disapprove of the voters’ wish to detach its local budget from the spending process on the Hill. It would also let city officials use a traditional July 1 to June 30 fiscal year, instead of the federal fiscal year, which runs from Oct. 1 to Sept. 30.
City officials said federal lawmakers will still have ultimate authority over the District and may object to the city’s budget during a routine 30-day period in which it passively reviews any D.C. law.
The D.C. Council authorized the referendum late last year with unanimous support. Mayor Vincent C. Gray signed the bill in late December, despite reservations about the measure’s legality.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- House panel OKs resolution to sue president for Obamacare delays
- Contrasting judgments on Obama's health care hours apart; appeals court calls subsidies unlawful
- New Democratic caucus will pressure GOP governors to expand Medicaid
- Insurers cough up refunds to subscribers under Obamacare ‘80-20 rule’
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq