- San Antonio mayor to Obama: Give amnesty to illegals with legal families
- NYPD disbands unit that spied on Muslims to go after ‘real bad guys’
- Donald Rumsfeld has ‘no idea’ if he paid taxes correctly
- Bradley Manning named honorary grand marshal of San Francisco Pride parade
- Look out PayPal: Facebook working toward mobile payments system
- U.S. rebukes Iran’s U.N. envoy pick over 1979 embassy attack
- Stoned mom avoids jail after driving 12 miles with baby on roof
- More than 100 ‘inappropriate’ encounters between NYC school staffers, students since 2009: report
- Joe Biden to Boston bombing survivors: ‘America will never, ever stand down’
- FBI failed to throughly vet Boston bombing suspect after Russian lead, report finds
MURCHISON: Lone Star collision avoidance?
Rick Perry and Wendy Davis seemed headed for a matchup
Gone is Ann Richards, the leathery, white-haired feminist champion whose life was celebrated in a Broadway play, “Ann,” starring Holland Taylor. The play is closing prematurely because of insufficient demand for white-haired feminist champions. Never mind that for now. We’ve got a second Ann, it would appear. She is a fellow Texan, to boot: State Sen. Wendy Davis, who just talked to death a bill meant to tighten abortion restrictions.
The chatter across the nation has been that Ms. Davis was looking like a prospective governor, if not, according to some of the more excited acolytes, a president of the United States.
Oh, the lengths to which the abortion debate, 40 years old now, still drives us.
The set-to between Ms. Davis and pro-life Gov. Rick Perry has proved especially engaging. Mr. Perry backed the bill, which would have forbidden abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy and required abortion clinics to follow the same sanitary and clinical standards that apply to conventional surgical centers.
Well, Ms. Davis wasn’t having any of that. She laced up her pink sneakers and began to talk. Free-speech fans in the Senate balcony shouted so loudly that they drowned out the proceedings as adjournment time approached. The bill died. Mr. Perry called a special session — at taxpayer expense — to clean up the mess that fidelity to the Ann Richards canon had left lying around the Capitol. He took time to note that Ms. Davis seemed willing to “say that children born into the worst of circumstances” — women like herself, the daughter of a single mother — “can’t grow to live successful lives.” The implication: It’s morally OK just to let such children slide away into oblivion, unborn, untested.
Who’s ahead, then? That’s the question after the emotional comments, the sanguine predictions of glory and the Ann-hood for Ms. Davis have faded.
It looks as though there won’t be a head-to-head matchup, Mr. Perry having announced this week his intention not to seek the governorship again. Ms. Davis could be forgiven for needing time to rearrange on her shoulders the Richards mantle laid thereupon.
The political reality is that in a 2016 Perry-Davis matchup, the governor would have beaten the senator all hollow. It would have been a treat to watch them put their differing premises on the table for all to see. For this reason alone — certainly not for the reason that Ms. Davis theoretically could have won the governorship — there is reason to regret the impossibility of such a race.
The Davis position in a nutshell: The choice to end most pregnancies (save very late ones, I imagine she would add) is the mother’s and the mother’s alone. The Davis position is mainstream, of course, in feminist circles, where no challenge to maternal privilege can be admitted, never mind the effect on a child who otherwise would have come forth.
The Perry position, in a nutshell: Life trumps competing considerations, such as convenience or desire. That’s to say, look, people, it’s a real live human being, not just some mass of “tissue” whose existence or non-existence is at stake. Some basic care, enforced by the state, seems indicated. Or, if not, why not?
I’ve never laid eyes on Ms. Davis. The fact is, her biography impresses. As Manny Fernandez recounts it in The New York Times, “She was a teenager when her first child was born but managed as a single mother to pull herself from a trailer park to Harvard Law School to a hard-fought seat in the Texas Senate, a rare liberal representing conservative Tarrant County.”
Is this of no consequence in the matter of appraising abortion’s moral and practical consequences? It would be provocative to hear her say why, when challenged by Mr. Perry or his like. We all could learn something from such an engagement. Maybe we will. The Richards set wants her for president. Mr. Perry himself is known to have yearned for the office. Interesting.
William Murchison is a nationally syndicated columnist.
TWT Video Picks
By returning to goodness, the nation can achieve greatness once again
Get Breaking Alerts
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- U.S. military on high alert as Ukraine troops trade gunfire with pro-Russian militants
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- Al Qaeda mocks U.S. in 'extraordinary' Yemen gathering; experts fear CIA caught flat-footed
- HHS nominee Sylvia Burwell entangled in MetLife lawsuit
- Russian fighter jet buzzes U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- Bill Clinton falls off vegan diet wagon but not vegan label
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Solution to Cyprus dispute is no 'mistake'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's real wealth redistribution scheme
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare numbers nothing to celebrate
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Unanswered bus-crash questions
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Lerner won't face meaningful punishment