- The Washington Times - Sunday, July 14, 2013

George Zimmerman may have been acquitted of all charges in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, but he may have to defend himself once more — this time against the federal government.

In the wake of Saturday night’s verdict, civil rights leaders and others are calling on the Obama administration’s Justice Department to wade into the case and bring charges against Mr. Zimmerman, the Hispanic neighborhood watch volunteer who was accused of murdering the 17-year-old in February 2012 in Sanford, Fla.

Mr. Zimmerman is a free man after a jury of six women found him not guilty, putting an end to one of the most racially charged trials in recent U.S. history. Some, however, say justice was not served and want the federal government to intervene.

“They will make a choice about whether they will pursue criminal civil rights charges. There is reason to be concerned that race was a factor in why [Mr. Zimmerman] targeted young Trayvon,” NAACP President Benjamin Jealous said during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union” program Sunday. “It’s important, just as we all put our faith in this justice system in Florida and in the jury, that we let the justice system run its course. There will be a federal civil rights phase. We are putting our faith in that system.”

The NAACP also has begun to circulate a petition calling on the federal government to act.

A federal review of the case already is underway, the Justice Department reiterated Sunday. The department first announced an investigation into Trayvon’s death last year.

“Experienced federal prosecutors will determine whether the evidence reveals a prosecutable violation of any of the limited federal criminal civil rights statutes without our jurisdiction, and whether federal prosecution is appropriate,” the agency said.

The Rev. Al Sharpton, an MSNBC talk-show host and a former Democratic presidential hopeful, said Sunday that he and the Martin family recently met with a U.S. attorney to discuss the case and push for action.

Mr. Sharpton, who led protests in Sanford in the weeks after Trayvon was killed, referred to federal civil rights charges as “plan B.”

“We now have a position on the books in the state of Florida where an unarmed teenager who committed no crime can be killed and the killer can say self-defense. That is dangerous. That is an atrocity. And that needs to be addressed,” Mr. Sharpton said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Lawmakers largely were mum about the issue Sunday. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota Democrat and a former prosecutor, wouldn’t comment on whether civil rights charges would be appropriate.

“I know you wait until you see all the evidence” before making a decision, she said on ABC’s “This Week.”

It’s unclear what evidence the Justice Department will be gathering as the investigation unfolds.

In order to bring successful civil rights charges, the federal government would have to prove that Mr. Zimmerman’s actions — following Trayvon on the night of his death and confronting him against the advice of the police dispatcher, eventually leading to the shooting — were motivated by racism.

In plain terms, the case would hinge on whether federal prosecutors could prove that Trayvon still would be alive were it not for Mr. Zimmerman’s prejudices.

Story Continues →