- Appeals court upholds Obamacare tax as constitutional
- As fighting in Gaza rages on, Kerry’s credibility questioned
- New Englander Scott Brown turns his gaze to the U.S. border crisis
- Toronto’s Rob Ford takes rehabbed self to kids’ playground for political props
- Sen. Joe Manchin sued by his brother over old loan: report
- New Mexico decides to use HealthCare.gov for 2015
- Satanists to use Hobby Lobby rule to skirt state abortion laws
- White House: No choice but to act now on climate change
- HHS: ‘Donut hole’ reforms saved Medicare enrollees $11.5 billion since 2010
- Boston-area tornado rips 100 homes: ‘Are we in Kansas?’
No evidence of politics in IRS cases, Oversight Democrats say
Question of the Day
A new 36-page memo from Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said that 15 interviews with IRS employees in Washington and Cincinnati have revealed no political motivation or White House involvement in the singling out of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, despite an inspector general’s report saying such groups were improperly targeted by the agency.
The investigation now includes full interviews with 15 employees — six Republicans, three Democrats and six “unaffiliated” workers — the memo says.
“Despite an extremely aggressive investigation involving thousands of documents and more than a dozen interviews of IRS employees, the overwhelming evidence before the committee reveals no political motivation or White House involvement in this process,” the memo reads.
Instead, the IRS employees in the tax service’s Cincinnati office sought guidance on how to process organizations applying for tax-exempt status in order to treat applicants consistently, the memo said.
The Cincinnati group manager in charge of employees handling political advocacy cases from May 2010 through February 2013, a self-identified Republican, echoed past claims that “tea party” cases were singled out for evidence of political advocacy.
“Review of the application showed that [there] wasn’t the precedents there to help guide through the application process,” the manager said. “So … we reached out to our Washington office for guidance.”
A Republican tax law specialist in Washington who handled tea party applications and drafted a guide sheet on how to handle political advocacy cases also said there was no White House involvement or bias against tea party groups.
She described as “kind of laughable” the idea of having a particular group in the D.C. office involved in advocacy cases based on an attempt to target President Obama’s political enemies.
“This is purely cases that, unfortunately, Cincinnati didn’t have enough guidance on,” she said. “That [tax-exempt] area is a very, very difficult area, and there’s not much guidance. And so the lingering length of time, unfortunately, was just trying to apply the law to the specific facts of each case.”
The GOP-led House committee recently approved a resolution asserting that the woman at the center of the IRS fiasco waived her Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination when she came before the committee in May.
Lois Lerner, director of tax-exempt organizations for the agency, began her testimony by denying that she acted improperly and then immediately invoked her right not to testify against herself.
Ms. Lerner tried to stop the Cincinnati field office’s targeting of tea party and other right-leaning groups by directing specialists in 2011 to broaden their criteria so that it did not appear partisan, according to an audit by J. Russell George, the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration. Yet the audit says the behavior resurfaced and had to be addressed once more in May 2012.
Ms. Lerner apologized at a May event with the American Bar Association for burdening the conservative groups from early 2010 to May 2012, an admission that set off a firestorm on Capitol Hill.
The announcement — staged through a prearranged question from the audience — was made days before the inspector general released the audit that confirmed Republican lawmakers’ suspicions in 2012 that tax investigators had targeted conservative groups.
Since then, however, Democrats have pushed for Mr. George to return to the committee and testify after it was discovered that an array of terms — not just “tea party or “9/12 project,” for example — were on so-called BOLO (“be-on-the-lookout”) lists.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Wilder, Cuccinelli may be called as witnesses in McDonnell trial
- Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's trial to test definitions of political corruption
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Mich. congressman returns Commerce award after group endorses opponent
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: 'Playing defense on the one-yard line'
Latest Blog Entries
- Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton 'clearly bears responsibility' on Benghazi
- Holder vows to press ahead on gun control fight
- Seven of 10 prefer that Obama work with Congress, not go around it: Poll
- Schumer: Tea party hasn't let Obama put his policies into effect
- GOP official: Black not running for Wolf's House seat
TWT Video Picks
- GOP Senate candidate: Obama needs to visit Central America
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Rush Limbaugh: 'There is no journalism anymore'
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- White House: No choice but to act now on climate change
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world