- N.Y. prosecutors: Russian diplomats bilked $1.5 million from Medicaid
- Happy Meal: Couple goes to McDonald’s, leaves with bag packed with cash
- Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
- Oh my God! Costco lists Bible as fiction, Ron Burgundy memoir as gospel
- Sarah Palin responds to Martin Bashir’s resignation, praises media
- Obama to send 2 Gitmo terror suspects back to Algeria
- Paul Walker secretly bought $9K wedding ring for Iraq vet
- Mystery sign poster hits Washington state town: ‘It’s OK to say Merry Christmas’
- Pope Francis forms commission to advise on sex abuse
- Anthony Weiner on radio? Cumulus says, ‘Never, ever’
No evidence of politics in IRS cases, Oversight Democrats say
A new 36-page memo from Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said that 15 interviews with IRS employees in Washington and Cincinnati have revealed no political motivation or White House involvement in the singling out of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, despite an inspector general’s report saying such groups were improperly targeted by the agency.
The investigation now includes full interviews with 15 employees — six Republicans, three Democrats and six “unaffiliated” workers — the memo says.
“Despite an extremely aggressive investigation involving thousands of documents and more than a dozen interviews of IRS employees, the overwhelming evidence before the committee reveals no political motivation or White House involvement in this process,” the memo reads.
Instead, the IRS employees in the tax service’s Cincinnati office sought guidance on how to process organizations applying for tax-exempt status in order to treat applicants consistently, the memo said.
The Cincinnati group manager in charge of employees handling political advocacy cases from May 2010 through February 2013, a self-identified Republican, echoed past claims that “tea party” cases were singled out for evidence of political advocacy.
“Review of the application showed that [there] wasn’t the precedents there to help guide through the application process,” the manager said. “So … we reached out to our Washington office for guidance.”
A Republican tax law specialist in Washington who handled tea party applications and drafted a guide sheet on how to handle political advocacy cases also said there was no White House involvement or bias against tea party groups.
She described as “kind of laughable” the idea of having a particular group in the D.C. office involved in advocacy cases based on an attempt to target President Obama’s political enemies.
“This is purely cases that, unfortunately, Cincinnati didn’t have enough guidance on,” she said. “That [tax-exempt] area is a very, very difficult area, and there’s not much guidance. And so the lingering length of time, unfortunately, was just trying to apply the law to the specific facts of each case.”
The GOP-led House committee recently approved a resolution asserting that the woman at the center of the IRS fiasco waived her Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination when she came before the committee in May.
Lois Lerner, director of tax-exempt organizations for the agency, began her testimony by denying that she acted improperly and then immediately invoked her right not to testify against herself.
Ms. Lerner tried to stop the Cincinnati field office’s targeting of tea party and other right-leaning groups by directing specialists in 2011 to broaden their criteria so that it did not appear partisan, according to an audit by J. Russell George, the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration. Yet the audit says the behavior resurfaced and had to be addressed once more in May 2012.
Ms. Lerner apologized at a May event with the American Bar Association for burdening the conservative groups from early 2010 to May 2012, an admission that set off a firestorm on Capitol Hill.
The announcement — staged through a prearranged question from the audience — was made days before the inspector general released the audit that confirmed Republican lawmakers’ suspicions in 2012 that tax investigators had targeted conservative groups.
Since then, however, Democrats have pushed for Mr. George to return to the committee and testify after it was discovered that an array of terms — not just “tea party or “9/12 project,” for example — were on so-called BOLO (“be-on-the-lookout”) lists.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Support for stricter gun laws drops: poll
- Scientists could unlock mystery of life beyond Earth within a decade
- House Democrats give grudging support to 10-year gun ban extension
- Extending plastic gun ban just first step?
- Obama hints at staying in D.C. after leaving office
Latest Blog Entries
- CURL: 'Mission Accomplished' for Obamacare
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- American teacher shot and killed at Benghazi international school
- U.S. drops 2,000 mice on Guam by parachute to kill snakes
- At minimum, a bad deal
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
We’re not all having tea with the Queen you know.
Happiness is attainable. Morning to night. I love to teach, deal with folks that have an issue and really wish to tackle it and write.
Film Reviews and Articles by Kevin Williams
White House pets gone wild!