- Israel halts peace talks with Palestinians
- Netanyahu’s driver accused of raping girls under age 12
- Putin calls Internet ‘CIA project’ that must be controlled
- Muslims offended that 9/11 museum movie speaks of jihad
- Obama marks Armenian massacre, avoids using the word ‘genocide’
- Gov. Rick Perry: ‘It’s not a dare, it’s a promise’; Texas will fight BLM
- Howard Dean cheers Obama’s approach to Russian aggression
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s childhood nickname? ‘The Surprise’
- Democrat Grimes backs Keystone XL pipeline in Kentucky Senate race
- China spends for 17 new warships as U.S. cuts back military
No evidence of politics in IRS cases, Oversight Democrats say
A new 36-page memo from Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said that 15 interviews with IRS employees in Washington and Cincinnati have revealed no political motivation or White House involvement in the singling out of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, despite an inspector general’s report saying such groups were improperly targeted by the agency.
The investigation now includes full interviews with 15 employees — six Republicans, three Democrats and six “unaffiliated” workers — the memo says.
“Despite an extremely aggressive investigation involving thousands of documents and more than a dozen interviews of IRS employees, the overwhelming evidence before the committee reveals no political motivation or White House involvement in this process,” the memo reads.
Instead, the IRS employees in the tax service’s Cincinnati office sought guidance on how to process organizations applying for tax-exempt status in order to treat applicants consistently, the memo said.
The Cincinnati group manager in charge of employees handling political advocacy cases from May 2010 through February 2013, a self-identified Republican, echoed past claims that “tea party” cases were singled out for evidence of political advocacy.
“Review of the application showed that [there] wasn’t the precedents there to help guide through the application process,” the manager said. “So … we reached out to our Washington office for guidance.”
A Republican tax law specialist in Washington who handled tea party applications and drafted a guide sheet on how to handle political advocacy cases also said there was no White House involvement or bias against tea party groups.
She described as “kind of laughable” the idea of having a particular group in the D.C. office involved in advocacy cases based on an attempt to target President Obama’s political enemies.
“This is purely cases that, unfortunately, Cincinnati didn’t have enough guidance on,” she said. “That [tax-exempt] area is a very, very difficult area, and there’s not much guidance. And so the lingering length of time, unfortunately, was just trying to apply the law to the specific facts of each case.”
The GOP-led House committee recently approved a resolution asserting that the woman at the center of the IRS fiasco waived her Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination when she came before the committee in May.
Lois Lerner, director of tax-exempt organizations for the agency, began her testimony by denying that she acted improperly and then immediately invoked her right not to testify against herself.
Ms. Lerner tried to stop the Cincinnati field office’s targeting of tea party and other right-leaning groups by directing specialists in 2011 to broaden their criteria so that it did not appear partisan, according to an audit by J. Russell George, the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration. Yet the audit says the behavior resurfaced and had to be addressed once more in May 2012.
Ms. Lerner apologized at a May event with the American Bar Association for burdening the conservative groups from early 2010 to May 2012, an admission that set off a firestorm on Capitol Hill.
The announcement — staged through a prearranged question from the audience — was made days before the inspector general released the audit that confirmed Republican lawmakers’ suspicions in 2012 that tax investigators had targeted conservative groups.
Since then, however, Democrats have pushed for Mr. George to return to the committee and testify after it was discovered that an array of terms — not just “tea party or “9/12 project,” for example — were on so-called BOLO (“be-on-the-lookout”) lists.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Supreme Court pushes consideration of N.J. gun case to April 25
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Michael Bloomberg charts $50M challenge to NRA: 'Got to make them afraid'
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- Obama avoids 'red line' for China, prepared to impose tougher sanctions on Russia
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- 'Conservatives' should feel exposed by Bundy's racist comments: Scarborough
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014