LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Zimmerman case example of justice served

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

Of all people to pass judgment on others, former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer would have been wise to remain silent and not vocalize his opinions on the George Zimmerman case (“Eliot Spitzer: Zimmerman verdict ‘a failure of justice,’” Web, July 14). The credibility of his opinions went down the drain when he denigrated his own reputation and humiliated his family by frequenting a high-priced prostitute in the nation’s capital.

Mr. Spitzer’s claim that the justice system failed and that the jury got it wrong seems to be his way of bringing more attention to himself. This case is not a failure of justice, as Mr. Spitzer claims; as a former prosecutor, he knows better. Rather, it is a demonstration of a trial that brought the totality of evidence forward for a jury to consider objectively and fairly, which it did. The verdict and the criminal justice process need to be respected.

This case also was not about race. It was not about Skittles and a drink. It involved two human beings who wound up in an altercation that has had an impact on many lives in profound ways.

Though it is tragic that Trayvon Martin is dead, he played a part in this situation as well. When Trayvon could have avoided confrontation by running to his father’s home (which was four minutes away), he chose to remain in the area. What transpired from there resulted in confrontation and a violent episode that leaves unrelenting impact.

Undoubtedly Mr. Zimmerman did not set out to kill anyone that night, and Trayvon was not the totally innocent victim he has been portrayed to be. He apparently contributed by attacking Mr. Zimmerman, causing injuries to him and provoking him to shoot in self-defense while he was being attacked and slammed into the pavement in fear for his life.

Though emotions have run high on this case, it is not one to have been decided on emotion but on the evidence presented in a court of law. The outcry calling for harm to Mr. Zimmerman and his family is an outrageous response to a case that was processed through the criminal justice system in accordance with the law. The resulting lesson should be that everyone must move forward nonviolently and heal peacefully.



© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts