- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
U.S. shells out millions for bum construction in Afghanistan: Report
A $3 million U.S.-contracted schools project in Afghanistan remains grossly unfinished more than four years after the start of construction because the Army Corps of Engineers did not hold the contractor accountable for the work it has been paid to do, a new report by a U.S. government watchdog says.
"This raises concerns because we have previously reported instances in which [the Corps of Engineers] failed to hold its contractors accountable for accomplishing the work they were paid to perform," says the report by the Special Inspector General of Afghanistan Reconstruction, and the IG believes that [the Army Corps of Engineers] must take immediate action to hold contractors accountable when they fail to deliver on their commitments."
The report focuses on the contract to build the Sheberghan Teaching Training Facility in the Jawzjan province in northern Afghanistan.
In February 2009, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Corps of Engineers awarded a $2.9 million contract to Iraqi company Mercury Development to build three educational facilities by December 2010. The contract was extended to the following June, and the price increased to $3.4 million.
Before the projects could be completed, Mercury Development walked away with $3.1 million. In one building, water, sewage and electrical systems remain unfinished, and exposed electrical wiring imperils occupants to shocks and fire hazards, the report says.
But the Corps of Engineers closed the contract and signed documents that said the construction was physically completed and all outstanding issues had been resolved.
Corps of Engineers "officials were unable to explain this decision because they were not the responsible officials in Afghanistan at that time," the report says.
A second contractor, Afghan-owned Zafarkhaliq Construction Co., was awarded $153,000 to finish the project, but had difficulties completing construction. The Corps of Engineers released that contractor from its obligations after it had completed only 65 percent of the work for more than $130,000, the report says.
A third contractor was hired to complete all remaining deficiencies, but USAID directed the Corps of Engineers to cancel the contract and return any remaining funds.
The special inspector general recommends that the commanding general of the Corps of Engineers find out why the contractors were released from their obligations despite "poor performance, unfinished construction, and electrical problems and determine appropriate actions."
A spokesman for the Corps of Engineers said that about 95 percent of the facilities were completed, and the first contractor abandoned the project due to security concerns in 2011. After that, the contract was "descoped," meaning that the amount of work and the contract amount were reduced.
The second contractor was released after its work was deemed deficient, and steps were taken to reduce the threat of unfinished electrical work, the spokesman said.
"We're doing all we can in the environment that we're in," Corps of Engineers spokesman Michael Beeman said.
USAID, which retains overall responsibility for the project, said it will select a new contractor at the end of July and ensure that all work is finished.
In the meantime, Afghans have started using the Sheberghan facility — a two-story building with 10 classrooms, four labs, a library and an administration office — despite being told not to and despite the numerous health and safety hazards, the report says.
"During our inspection, we noticed that because of the lack of electricity, the halls and classrooms were dimly lit by natural light coming through the windows. In addition, it was cold and most faculty and students wore coats because the heating system was not operational," the report says. "Further, because there was no running water, the bathroom facilities were locked and not accessible to faculty or students, requiring them to leave the school area to find toilet facilities."
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.