LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Shady nighttime deal brokering

Story Topics

There is a certain irony to Sen. Harry Reid’s latest cries to end filibusters when history shows more Democrats have cast votes to continue them than Republicans (“Sen. Harry Reid: Founding Fathers didn’t want filibusters,” Web, July 15). In fact, one of the most notable filibusters in history occurred when Democratic senators attempted to block passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Whether it is the next 1,000-page “must-pass-immediately” legislation or the latest nominee, it would be nice for Congress to let the system work for the people by realizing when there is not considerable support for something. If there is a real, critical need for specific legislation or certain positions to be filled, assume we will demand it. However, with Congress’ latest approval rating at 17 percent, I am inclined to believe the people are looking for less activity and more deliberation.

The latest loggerhead was about Cabinet-level appointments. While the Democrats were all in favor of filibusters when they were the minority, Mr. Reid is no longer a fan, as Republicans denied approval of three Cabinet-level nominees. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution specifies the requirement of “advice and consent” of the Senate for appointments to such posts by the president.

For those who take the “advice and consent” clause (and, for that matter, the Constitution) seriously, have no fear. Like most legislation and important decisions at the federal level these days, there was a late-night deal made between the parties. It seems Mr. Reid went to a few guys the Democrats can typically rely on, such as Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, and the do-nothing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican.

What kind of deal did these guardians of the Constitution broker? It looks like they have promised the votes necessary to confirm the nominees for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Labor secretary and Environmental Protection Agency secretary in exchange for forcing out the two unconstitutionally appointed National Labor Relations Board members.

Perhaps all the fuss is in vain, after all, as we now have as Labor secretary Thomas E. Perez, who infamously dropped the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation lawsuit when he was assistant attorney general.

RINGO LANZETTI

Falls Church

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts