- The Washington Times - Friday, July 19, 2013

The White House and its liberal allies in the news media have launched an all-out campaign to peddle Obamacare to an understandably doubting public.

While just about every poll in the country is telling the administration that Americans care more about finding a job and getting a weak economy back on track, President Obama is out promoting his signature social welfare law: the government’s de facto takeover of the nation’s health care system.

A front-page article Wednesday in The New York Times, one of Mr. Obama’s staunchest political allies, trumpets the administration’s line that the Affordable Care Act will cost New Yorkers a lot less than they thought. Of course, there is no way anyone can predict that for certain, because all the pieces haven’t been completed, despite a looming October deadline for a national system of health insurance exchanges that is nowhere near its 50-state goal.

On Thursday, The Washington Post ran a front-page sales pitch that said the White House has put together a political team from its 2008 and 2012 campaigns to “persuade young and minority voters” to sign up for his government health care plan.


The person in charge of this initiative, working out of the White House, was Mr. Obama’s campaign director of public opinion research and polling. And you thought health care professionals were in charge of Obamacare?

But let’s not mince words. Obamacare is in trouble and facing a minefield of postponements, delays, setbacks and a growing list of implementation failures. To make it work financially, millions of uninsured must sign up for medical coverage, especially younger, healthier people, and that is very much in doubt right now.

Obamacare’s long-term nursing plan for the elderly has been repealed after the administration concluded that it is financially unworkable. About half the states have decided against creating their own health insurance exchanges, instead letting the federal government run the exchange program, which is a central pillar of the system. The administration has just announced that it is delaying the employer health insurance mandate until 2015, a critical component in the law’s finances.

Right after the administration made its surprising not-ready-for-prime-time announcement, the Department of Health and Human Services released a video saying Obamacare was “on schedule.” Sure.

The Heritage Foundation, one of Obamacare’s chief critics, notes a Government Accountability Office report released last month that said the failure to complete the federal exchange system and the other missed deadlines “suggest a potential for challenges going forward.”

Rep. Kevin Brady, Texas Republican and chairman of the House Ways and Means subcommittee on health, ticks off some of the implementing items that are undone: income verification, postponed; the data hub, behind schedule; employer insurance verification, delayed.

Democrats have been unusually blunt in their criticism of the administration’s incompetence. Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, the Finance Committee chairman who helped write the law, now says it is heading toward “a train wreck.”

House Republicans, pointing to the employer mandate delay, passed legislation Wednesday to do just that, and to postpone the insurance mandate on individuals for one year, too.

Rep. Dave Camp, Michigan Republican and Ways and Means Committee chairman, lashed out at an administration that “thinks only businesses should be exempt from the pain inflicted by Obamacare. How is that fair? Families and individuals already are struggling in this Obama economy. They are paying more for gas and more for food, and wages aren’t keeping up with the ever-increasing costs of everyday life. Don’t these hardworking Americans deserve the same relief?”

A strong point. With so many Americans out of work, how can anyone justify forcing people to buy insurance they do not want or that will wreak havoc with their limited budgets?

The individual mandate will become effective next year. By 2016, anyone who isn’t insured will be fined up to $695.

Story Continues →