- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
‘Nuclear option’ on filibusters a possibility down the road, Reid says
Question of the Day
President Obama’s new appointees to the National Labor Relations Board appear headed for a smooth confirmation as part of a deal struck by Senate Democrats and Republicans to avoid a nasty rules fight.
However, Senate Democrats still are holding out the possibility of pulling the “nuclear option” back off the shelf for a looming showdown over judicial nominees.
Nancy Schiffer, a former AFL-CIO associate general counsel, and Kent Hirozawa, chief lawyer for the board’s Democratic chairman, both pledged to be impartial arbiters Tuesday as senators tiptoed around the grueling negotiations it took to get them before the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee.
“Today’s hearing is the result of a bipartisan agreement that was reached to allow for a fully confirmed National Labor Relations Board for the first time in over a decade,” said Sen. Tom Harkin, Iowa Democrat and committee chairman. “I hope that this agreement brings a new beginning for the board so that we can ratchet down the political rhetoric that seems to surround this agency and, instead, let the dedicated public servants who work there do their jobs.”
Senate Democrats recently agreed to drop their threat to change the chamber’s filibuster rules in exchange for votes on four of Mr. Obama’s appointees. Republicans said they got the president to withdraw two controversial nominees to the NLRB, but he won assurances that Ms. Schiffer and Mr. Hirozawa will be approved before the Senate leaves for its monthlong summer recess.
The eleventh-hour deal also left Democrats able to employ the so-called “nuclear option” and change the filibuster rules later this year if they think Republicans are obstructing appointments unfairly.
Mr. Reid, who helped pioneer filibusters against appellate court nominees when President George W. Bush was in office, has said he doesn’t intend to change those rules — though some members of his caucus have pushed him to do so.
Republicans said Mr. Obama’s withdrawing two NLRB nominees was a victory because the previous two had been given recess appointments in January 2012 — appointments that a federal appeals court ruled unconstitutional because the Senate wasn’t in recess.
Still, Republicans struggled to explain why they also didn’t refuse to budge on Richard Cordray, who was given a recess appointment the same day as the NLRB nominees yet he won confirmation to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau last week. A Senate aide said it came down to the fact that Republicans were more unified on the NLRB nominees than they were in opposing Mr. Cordray.
While the recent fight was over executive branch nominees, the White House and interest groups have said Republicans are trying to block the president’s judicial picks as well.
Mr. Obama has teed up three nominees to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which is viewed as the second-most-important court in the country because it handles appeals from major regulatory agencies, including the NLRB.
Indeed, that was the same court that ruled Mr. Obama violated the Constitution with his recess appointments to the NLRB.
Republicans say the move to add the three judges to the court is retaliation for that decision, and they have vowed to block the nominations, saying the panel already has enough judges to handle its caseload.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Half can't name political party of their member of Congress, poll finds
- Mich. congressman returns Commerce award after group endorses opponent
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: 'Playing defense on the one-yard line'
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Far out: Astronauts testify from International Space Station
Latest Blog Entries
- Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton 'clearly bears responsibility' on Benghazi
- Holder vows to press ahead on gun control fight
- Seven of 10 prefer that Obama work with Congress, not go around it: Poll
- Schumer: Tea party hasn't let Obama put his policies into effect
- GOP official: Black not running for Wolf's House seat
TWT Video Picks
By Steve King
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- U.S. evacuates embassy in Libya amid violent clashes between militias
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Obama: U.S. should 'embrace an economic patriotism that says we rise or fall together'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq