- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro ‘marriage’
- Sebelius calls for review of Obamacare rollout woes
- American dream dying, but many see free market as solution: Poll
- Air Force base in South Carolina boots Nativity scene
- Israel poised for a $173M boost from the U.S. for missile defense
- Leon Panetta named as source of ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ scriptwriter’s information
- Mandela service sign language interpreter: ‘He made up his own signs’
- Pope Francis named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’
- Ben Affleck: Fundraising for Democrats started to ‘feel gross’
- Vladimir Putin orders military to boost presence in Arctic
EDITORIAL: Pennsylvania’s booze monopoly
The state can’t give up its addiction to strong drink
Healthy libations are a traditional part of many Independence Day celebrations. A cold beer goes well with a barbecue, but Pennsylvanians can’t head to their local convenience store or gas station to pick up a six-pack. The state has a bizarre set of regulations limiting such sales to restaurants, and those who want to toast liberty with wine or liquor must pay a visit to a state liquor store.
It has been this way since the 1930s. Along with Utah, Pennsylvania remains the only other state with a monopoly on wholesale and retail sales of wine and liquor. Beer distributors have a little more leeway, but they operate in territories that are protected from competition.
Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania’s Republican governor, wants to sell the state’s liquor stores. Privatized sales would likely mean more outlets, more overall sales and more tax revenue for the state. Consumers would see lower prices, better service and more variety. The state of Washington discovered these benefits last year when it jettisoned its state liquor monopoly. Anything the government can do, private enterprise can do better.
Pennsylvania’s Republican-controlled legislature should be expected to leap to the embrace of free enterprise, competition and consumer choice. Sadly, it is headed in the opposite direction. Local 98 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, which represents the 3,000 state liquor store employees (don’t ask us why), is pressuring the politicians to keep these employees on the public payroll, and hence union membership.
According to the Pennsylvania Independent, an investigative news website, state Sen. Charles McIlhinney, the Republican chairman of the Senate Law and Justice Committee, received $25,000 in 2010 from the Lower Bucks Leadership Fund, a political action committee funded by the union.
Mr. McIlhinney managed the privatization bill in the legislature, derailing passage in the legislative session, which just ended. He calls a connection of cause and effect “ridiculous.” He told Eric Boehm of the Independent, “I didn’t ask the [International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers] to give me that money.” The check probably flew in over the transom.
Entrenched interests always squawk when someone proposes the government do less. Virginia’s Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican, learned this when he tried to persuade the Republican-controlled General Assembly to relinquish the state franchise on demon rum.
While there may (or may not) have been reasons to regulate the sale of alcohol in the aftermath of Prohibition, those days vanished long ago. Mississippi was the last state to formally repeal the 19th Amendment in 1966, depriving bootleggers with a federal stamp of their jobs. Forty-seven years later, Pennsylvania, Utah and Virginia should take a step into the 21st century.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Harry Reid's favor factory
- EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama's pretentious obsession
- EDITORIAL: The shake that shook the world
- EDITORIAL: Electric dreams
- EDITORIAL: Colorado ruling takes the cake
Latest Blog Entries
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
Get Breaking Alerts
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- More than a quarter million sign up for Obamacare in November
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- Obama's antics at Nelson Mandela tribute: Jovial conversation, handshake with Raul Castro
- MILLER: Dick Heller challenges D.C.s gun registration, files for summary judgement in Heller II
- Gov't Motors: Obama fudges math on auto bailout, $10.5 billion loss for taxpayers
- FITTON: A closer look at the Benghazi lie