- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
LAMBRO: Obamacare goes wobbly
Implementation delay signals Democrats fear a lethal blowback
The White House decision to delay the implementation of Obamacare’s business mandate for one year sent shock waves through political circles in Washington.
The Obama administration tried to cloak its decision in soothing rhetoric about giving small businesses more time to provide health insurance benefits for employees who work more than 30 hours a week, a policy that was set to begin next January.
“We believe we need to give employers more time to comply with the new rules,” President Obama’s senior White House political fixer, Valerie Jarrett, wrote in her blog on Tuesday night. “This allows employers time to … make any necessary adaptations to their health benefits while staying the course toward making health coverage more affordable and accessible for their workers.”
Baloney. The West Wing’s sudden decision has midterm congressional election politics and a weak, job-starved, economy written all over it. Mr. Obama’s top political advisers are getting hit by rising complaints from Democrats who fear that the mandate is a ticking time bomb that will hurt the party’s chances in the 2014 elections, especially in close Senate races where Obamacare is very unpopular.
That’s when the Obamacare law was scheduled to force businesses with workforces of 50 or more people to provide health insurance for their employees or else get slapped with a $2,000 fine for each worker.
Businesses who operate on the margin, and have been struggling to survive in the weak Obama economy, have been objecting to the mandate provision, warning that it will mean laying off workers or using more part-timers who work fewer hours to evade the mandate’s 30-hour threshold.
“Employers are going to continue to restructure their businesses to avoid pulling the 50-employer trigger. And it isn’t reporting requirements that are the primary concern of employers — it’s the cost of the Obamacare health insurance and fines,” says veteran health care analyst Grace-Marie Turner.
While the White House sought to portray the one-year delay as a careful policy decision to give small businesses more time to understand the new law’s complex rules and regulations, political observers weren’t fooled.
By delaying the mandate until January 2015, “the Obama administration heads off the unseemly spectacle of companies vowing to cut jobs or workers’ hours to avoid the costly mandate,” wrote Sarah Kliff on Wednesday in The Washington Post.
Republicans are planning to make Obamacare and its job-killing mandates a major issue in the midterm House and Senate races, warning that it will lead to higher health-insurance premiums and that “the train wreck will only get worse,” said House Speaker John A. Boehner. “This is a clear acknowledgment that the law is unworkable.”
That fear has led to a case of the political jitters among Democrats in Congress who have privately expressed their concerns to the White House. It hasn’t gotten much media attention, but lawmakers in both parties have just begun to draft bipartisan legislation that would raise the mandate’s threshold for employees who work more than 40 hours a week, among other changes.
The decision to postpone the mandate was made by Mr. Obama on Air Force One as he was returning from Africa on Tuesday. The last-minute pullback didn’t sit well with some of his advisers.
Bob Kocher, a former health care adviser to Mr. Obama, expressed disappointment, saying it will result in a growing uncertainty about when other sections of the law will take effect. “It confuses people [and] will undermine all the other rules because people will expect delay,” he said.
Other Obamacare supporters worry that any delays will give opponents of the law more confidence that they can kill it outright.
“Politically, it won’t get easier a year from now. It will get harder,” says John McDonough, a Harvard professor who was Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s health policy adviser. “You’ve given the employer community a sense of confidence that maybe they can kill this. If I were an employer, I would smell blood in the water,” he said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Study: Children fare better in traditional mom-dad families
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'