- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
LAMBRO: Obamacare goes wobbly
Implementation delay signals Democrats fear a lethal blowback
The White House decision to delay the implementation of Obamacare’s business mandate for one year sent shock waves through political circles in Washington.
The Obama administration tried to cloak its decision in soothing rhetoric about giving small businesses more time to provide health insurance benefits for employees who work more than 30 hours a week, a policy that was set to begin next January.
“We believe we need to give employers more time to comply with the new rules,” President Obama’s senior White House political fixer, Valerie Jarrett, wrote in her blog on Tuesday night. “This allows employers time to … make any necessary adaptations to their health benefits while staying the course toward making health coverage more affordable and accessible for their workers.”
Baloney. The West Wing’s sudden decision has midterm congressional election politics and a weak, job-starved, economy written all over it. Mr. Obama’s top political advisers are getting hit by rising complaints from Democrats who fear that the mandate is a ticking time bomb that will hurt the party’s chances in the 2014 elections, especially in close Senate races where Obamacare is very unpopular.
That’s when the Obamacare law was scheduled to force businesses with workforces of 50 or more people to provide health insurance for their employees or else get slapped with a $2,000 fine for each worker.
Businesses who operate on the margin, and have been struggling to survive in the weak Obama economy, have been objecting to the mandate provision, warning that it will mean laying off workers or using more part-timers who work fewer hours to evade the mandate’s 30-hour threshold.
“Employers are going to continue to restructure their businesses to avoid pulling the 50-employer trigger. And it isn’t reporting requirements that are the primary concern of employers — it’s the cost of the Obamacare health insurance and fines,” says veteran health care analyst Grace-Marie Turner.
While the White House sought to portray the one-year delay as a careful policy decision to give small businesses more time to understand the new law’s complex rules and regulations, political observers weren’t fooled.
By delaying the mandate until January 2015, “the Obama administration heads off the unseemly spectacle of companies vowing to cut jobs or workers’ hours to avoid the costly mandate,” wrote Sarah Kliff on Wednesday in The Washington Post.
Republicans are planning to make Obamacare and its job-killing mandates a major issue in the midterm House and Senate races, warning that it will lead to higher health-insurance premiums and that “the train wreck will only get worse,” said House Speaker John A. Boehner. “This is a clear acknowledgment that the law is unworkable.”
That fear has led to a case of the political jitters among Democrats in Congress who have privately expressed their concerns to the White House. It hasn’t gotten much media attention, but lawmakers in both parties have just begun to draft bipartisan legislation that would raise the mandate’s threshold for employees who work more than 40 hours a week, among other changes.
The decision to postpone the mandate was made by Mr. Obama on Air Force One as he was returning from Africa on Tuesday. The last-minute pullback didn’t sit well with some of his advisers.
Bob Kocher, a former health care adviser to Mr. Obama, expressed disappointment, saying it will result in a growing uncertainty about when other sections of the law will take effect. “It confuses people [and] will undermine all the other rules because people will expect delay,” he said.
Other Obamacare supporters worry that any delays will give opponents of the law more confidence that they can kill it outright.
“Politically, it won’t get easier a year from now. It will get harder,” says John McDonough, a Harvard professor who was Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s health policy adviser. “You’ve given the employer community a sense of confidence that maybe they can kill this. If I were an employer, I would smell blood in the water,” he said.
That’s exactly what is happening on Capitol Hill among Republicans who have been emboldened by Mr. Obama’s last-minute decision to delay the mandate’s implementation.
“Instead of simply delaying implementation of Obamacare, we should repeal it in its entirety,” said Chris Chocola, president of the free-market Club for Growth.
The message that the White House has been getting since the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010 is that businesses will pare down their workforces to reduce their exposure to higher health care costs. It is now beginning to sink in.
Let’s not mince words. The White House’s decision to delay the mandate was driven by the nation’s weak jobs numbers and its looming political impact next year.
While the national unemployment rate remains around 7.6 percent, the bleak reality is that 18 states — including the most populous ones — have much higher jobless rates, and 15 of them are between 8 percent and 9.5 percent.
As long as these numbers persist, Mr. Obama’s employer mandate is dead in the water.
Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and contributor to The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- EDITORIAL: Connecticut revolts against gun controls that could criminalize 300,000
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- Two liberals say Sarah Palin is right: Obama lacks substance
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Soldier who hid to avoid saluting the flag to be punished in secret; Army won't release details
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults