- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Cardin: Debate possible on privacy, top-secret programs
Question of the Day
A key Democratic senator said Wednesday the collection of phone records and other mass data is “well understood,” but there is room to discuss the broader implications of the spying programs.
“We want to make sure we have the right balance between keeping Americans safe and their privacy rights, so how that information is used is really the question,” Sen. Ben Cardin, Maryland Democrat, said on MSNBC’s “The Daily Rundown.”
Mr. Cardin made his comments after Sen. Ron Wyden, Oregon Democrat, expressed his displeasure Tuesday with National Intelligence Director James Clapper’s assertion in March that the government does not “wittingly” collect data on Americans’ phone calls.
Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old analyst with access to top-secret information, shocked Washington by disclosing that the National Security Agency programs that keep phone call logs and collect Internet data from foreigners through a hyper-secret program known as Prism.
Mr. Cardin said federal lawmakers can debate the best way to preserve personal liberty in an “open forum.”
“But talking about specific information, and how that specific information was utilized — in other words, connecting the dots — is something that we will probably need to keep classified,” the senator said.
Mr. Cardin also told the program he supports New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand’s push to let military prosecutors, instead of commanders, decide which sexual assault cases to try in light of reports that sex-related complaints in the military have been mishandled.
The proposal suffered a setback this week, when Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Armed Services Committee, decided to remove the measure from a defense spending bill up for debate.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Very religious still lean toward GOP, reflecting long-term patterns, Gallup poll shows
- Number-crunchers put GOP chances of retaking Senate at 60 percent: report
- Rep. Mike Rogers: Lock Israel-Palestine negotiators in a room
- Medicare trust fund to last 4 years longer: Obama administration
- Fla. voters' support for medical marijuana bodes well for ballot measure: poll
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq