- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
House bill bars abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy
Proposal called ‘dangerous, unconstitutional’
Question of the Day
The HouseJudiciary Committee approved a bill Wednesday that would ban abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy, igniting a debate over the thorny social issue at a time when some in the GOP fear they are alienating female voters.
The Republican-led panel voted 20-12 to forward to the full chamber the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which is based on the belief that fetuses can feel pain after the five-month threshold.
“Delivered or not, babies are babies, and it has been shown that they can feel pain at least by 20 weeks,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, Virginia Republican, said. “It is time to welcome young children who can feel pain into the human family.”
Rep. Trent Franks, the bill’s chief sponsor, initially wrote his bill to cover just the District of Columbia, since Congress has direct oversight of the nation’s capital, but expanded it to cover the nation after abortion provider Kermit Gosnell was convicted of killing babies born alive after botched abortions at his Philadelphia clinic.
The bill mirrors state-by-state efforts to place limits on abortion based on the length of time post-fertilization, although courts have struck down some of the laws and key Republicans want to shift their focus away from controversial issues such as abortion after recent losses at the ballot box.
“At a time when Americans want their elected officials to focus on creating jobs and building our economy, the House majority has instead once again decided to reignite its war on women,” Democratic Reps. Louise M. Slaughter, of New York, and Diana DeGette, of Colorado, said on behalf of the House Pro-Choice Caucus.
The Planned Parenthood Federation of American also condemned the legislation as “dangerous and unconstitutional.”
The committee voted along party lines to defeat a Democratic amendment that would have carved out an exception for pregnancies that are the result of rape of incest.
Mr. Franks, Arizona Republican, had urged his colleagues to reject the amendment, arguing the number of pregnancies resulting from rape is “very low.”
His remarks raised eyebrows among Democrats. Rep. Zoe Lofgren, of California, decried the claim as baseless and “astonishing” given GOP lawmakers’ failures in recent elections after politically damaging attempts to comment on rape and resulting pregnancies.
“The idea that the Republican men on this committee think they can tell the women of America that they have to carry, to term, the product of a rape is outrageous,” she said.
Then-Rep. Todd Akin, Missouri Republican, lost his bid for a Senate seat last year after saying a woman’s body can thwart a pregnancy after a “legitimate rape.”
Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock lost to Democrat Joe Donnelly in Indiana after saying that “even if life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.”
Mr. Franks took strides to explain his remarks, saying abortions conducted after the fifth month of pregnancy are rarely the result of rapes.
His reasoning is that rapes are typically reported immediately, and any resulting pregnancies from the crime could be addressed well before the legislation’s 20-week threshold.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- House panel OKs resolution to sue president for Obamacare delays
- Contrasting judgments on Obama's health care hours apart; appeals court calls subsidies unlawful
- New Democratic caucus will pressure GOP governors to expand Medicaid
- Insurers cough up refunds to subscribers under Obamacare ‘80-20 rule’
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq