- Billy Graham near death, ‘close to going home to be with the Lord’
- SeaTac, Wash.: City’s new $15 minimum wage heads to court
- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
- Obama ‘birther’ theories float, as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- U.S. drone faulted for killing 14 ‘innocent civilians’ at Yemen wedding
- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
Immigration debate bogs down over how to vote on amendments
The immigration debate is getting off to a bad start with Republicans and Democrats already sparring over how to even vote on amendments — with Democrats insisting every vote achieve a 60-vote filibuster-style threshold in order to pass.
“This is a very provocative act,” said Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Iowa Republican.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, countered that immigration is such a big issue that any changes to the bill, including two border security amendments he wanted to schedule votes on, should have to pass the supermajority threshold.
“How many times have we heard the Republican leader say on this floor, and publicly, that the new reality in the United States Senate is 60?” Mr. Reid said, pointing to the GOP’s repeated filibusters of President Obama’s agenda.
Senators voted Tuesday to begin the immigration debate, and dozens of amendments have already been filed, including several key fights over border security and building a more elaborate border fence.
One of the amendments Mr. Reid wanted to subject to a filibuster threshold would have required 350 miles of two-tier fencing be built before illegal immigrants get legal status, and another 350 miles be built before they can later earn citizenship.
Another amendment would have delayed the initial legalization until after the border is secure.
But as in previous immigration debates, this year’s affair is already getting bogged down in questions over exactly which amendments Democrats will allow to come to the floor to be voted on.
Several of the border security amendments could potentially get majority support, but would not likely be able to hit the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster, which is why Mr. Reid wants to require the higher level of support.
In recent years, both sides have agreed that those kinds of controversial issues would be subject to the filibuster threshold, even though an actual filibuster is not ever required.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- Wind farms: Interior Department sacrifices eagle protection for alternative energy
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Bipartisan House votes against 'patent trolls' who file lawsuits against innovators
- Bipartisan House votes to stop patent 'trolls'
Latest Blog Entries
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Broncos-Chargers game ends with several stabbings
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- American missing in Iran was CIA operative who went rogue
- Obama birther theories float, as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- Kim Jong-un consolidating power or losing grip on North Korea's military
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- PRUDEN: The last living witnesses; they wore the yellow star and remember the Nazi terror
- KEENE: James Clapper should resign for lying to Congress
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow